Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,090 of 50,863    |
|    More Judicial Activism to All    |
|    Colorado Court Rules Against Baker Who R    |
|    13 Aug 15 23:58:50    |
      XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: misc.legal       From: ban.all.faggots@barackobama.com              A state appeals court in Colorado ruled Thursday that a baker       could not cite religious beliefs in refusing to make wedding       cakes for same-sex couples.              The decision is the latest in a series of similar rulings across       the country that have been cheered by civil rights groups but       attacked by conservative Christians as assaults on religious       liberty.              Whether photographers, florists, bakers and other vendors who       are Christians should have a right to refuse services for same-       sex marriages has emerged as a major cultural and legal battle,       one that has intensified since the Supreme Court decision in       June establishing same-sex marriage as a constitutional right.              In the Colorado case, “the court squarely said that this is       discrimination based on sexual orientation and it’s not to be       tolerated, even if it’s motivated by faith,” said Louise       Melling, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties       Union, which represented the gay couple. “Religious liberty       gives you the right to your beliefs but not the right to harm       others.”              But lawyers for the cake shop said the appeals panel “got it       wrong” and that they would probably appeal to Colorado’s Supreme       Court.              “Our client did not engage in sexual-orientation       discrimination,” said Jeremy Tedesco, a senior lawyer with       Alliance Defending Freedom, the Christian legal group based in       Arizona. He argued that an objection to same-sex marriage was       not the same as discriminating against a gay person and noted       that the baker, Jack Phillips, of Masterpiece Cakeshop in       Lakewood, Colo., also refused to make cakes celebrating       Halloween because he associates the holiday with Satan.              “Cake decorating is his medium for creating art and they are       compelling him to engage in artistic expression that violates       his beliefs,” Mr. Tedesco said, resulting in a trampling of his       First Amendment rights to freedom of expression and religion.              But a unanimous three-judge panel of the Colorado Court of       Appeals, in upholding the decision of the state Commission on       Human Rights, rejected the argument that selling a cake to a gay       couple was so great an infringement on Mr. Phillip’s beliefs       that it trumped the anti-discrimination law.              No reasonable observer, the decision said, “would interpret       Masterpiece’s providing a wedding cake for a same-sex couple as       an endorsement of same-sex marriage, rather than a reflection of       its desire to conduct business in accordance with Colorado’s       public accommodations law.”              In July of 2012, a gay couple asked Masterpiece to create a       wedding cake for a celebration of their marriage. Mr. Phillips       told them that he could not design and bake a cake for them       because it would violate his Christian convictions.              The couple, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, filed a complaint       under Colorado law, which bars discrimination in public       accommodations based on sexual orientation. An administrative       law judge and then the Colorado Civil Rights Commission both       ruled that the cake shop had engaged in illegal discrimination.              Neither the law nor Thursday’s ruling prevents Mr. Phillips’       shop “from expressing its views on same-sex marriage — including       its religious opposition to it — and the bakery remains free to       dissociate itself from its customers’ viewpoints,” the appeals       court stated.              In a case involving similar arguments over artistic expression,       the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that a photographer       who refused to photograph a same-sex wedding had violated an       anti-discrimination law.              http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/14/us/colorado-court-rules-       against-baker-who-refused-to-serve-same-sex-couples.html?_r=0              --       Homophobe - A made up gay word to help gay sexual degenerates       feel better about themselves and their unnatural desire to       consume their own faeces from another man's penis.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca