XPost: soc.support.fat-acceptance, sac.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: cliffp@gmail.com
In article
Lady Veteran wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 09:48:41 +0100 (CET), "Cliff"
> wrote:
>
> >In article
> >Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>
> >> In article ,
> >> "Mel Schacher" wrote:
> >>
> >> > "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message
> >> > news:di436bdskhbrqm1vh7d66d12futcegldtv@4ax.com...
> >> >
> >> > On 4 Dec 2015 02:29:36 GMT, MarkA wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 07:49:37 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> On 3 Dec 2015 15:16:10 GMT, MarkA wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>>On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:03:49 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> On 2 Dec 2015 21:11:40 GMT, MarkA
wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>>On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:01:11 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> On 2 Dec 2015 17:34:55 GMT, MarkA
wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:36:10 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>> On 1 Dec 2015 17:19:13 GMT, MarkA
> >> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>Hardly a straw man.
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>Everyone who opposes abortion on demand is making the
statement
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>that a microscopic clump of cells is more important than the
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>woman whose uterus is being usurped.
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>> LOL
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Straw man and, of course, a lie.
> >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>How so?
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>> The whole statement is just leftist hyperbolic bullshit.
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>Hardly.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Absolutely. I'm not here to argue "everyone's" position.
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>Apparently, you're not even here to argue your own.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> I've already done it. You couldn't handle it so you started
bringing
> >> > >>>> up other people's positions for me to defend.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Doesn't work that way.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>Actually, you were doing pretty well, right up until I started
pointing
> >> > >>>out how internally inconsistent your views are.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Except they are NOT inconsistent.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> If you say a woman does
> >> > >>>NOT have the right to defend her uterus from an unwanted fetus
> >> > >>
> >> > >> ROFLMAO
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Now you're just being stupid.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> "Defend her uterus..."
> >> > >>
> >> > >> "Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
> >> > >> -Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
> >> > >
> >> > >Typical conservative: if reality conflicts with your beliefs, deny
> >> > >reality. I hope you never get a parasite. It would be "stupid" to
> >> > >defend your body against it, right? And you still can't figure out why
> >> > >you are inconsistent?
> >> >
> >> > Typical ignorant liberal- desperately trying to compare a human baby
> >> > with a parasite.
> >>
> >>
> >> If the woman doesn't want to have a baby, the fetus IS a parasite,
> >> stealing nutrients from its host.
> >
> >The woman didn't feel that way when she was getting her goop
> >chute pounded and inviting all those parasite seeds in.
> >
> >What do you call that? Post-pounded depression?
>
> How about women who get raped? You want to force to have this spawn
> from hell?
We're not discussing negro and hispanic sexual habits in this
thread. Yet.
> Of course you would. You are Republican.
Wrong. I'm Libertarian. If you don't want to get knocked up,
close your legs and make better choices. It's not my
responsibility to pay for your lack of.
> LV
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
