Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,232 of 50,863    |
|    * * * * to All    |
|    Judges Seem Skeptical of Tom Brady’s Def    |
|    15 Mar 16 07:18:43    |
      XPost: alt.sports.football.pro.denver-broncos, alt.sports.footba       l.pro.ne-patriots, rec.arts.tv       XPost: alt.tv       From: cheaters@nfl.com              A federal appeals court panel indicated Thursday that it was not       sympathetic to Patriots quarterback Tom Brady’s defense in what       is known as the Deflategate case, perhaps signaling that it will       overturn the district court’s ruling against the N.F.L.              The hearing was ostensibly about whether N.F.L. Commissioner       Roger Goodell overstepped his bounds as arbitrator in Brady’s       appeal of his four-game suspension. Judge Richard M. Berman of       Federal District Court in Manhattan ruled in September that       Brady had not been treated fairly and should not be suspended       for deflating footballs because he had not been aware that such       misconduct could lead to the kind of punishment he had received.              The three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for       the Second Circuit signaled from the outset that, rather than       focusing on the question of Goodell’s authority, they were more       interested in the details of Deflategate, including why Brady       destroyed a cellphone the N.F.L. wanted to see and whether a       four-game suspension was appropriate for tampering with how much       air was in a football.              Goodell and Brady did not attend the appeals hearing, unlike in       August, when they appeared twice in the courthouse next door and       attracted hundreds of onlookers and dozens of television crews.              But the tension in the courtroom Thursday was palpable as       lawyers for both sides were questioned for more than an hour,       and it appeared that at least two of the judges were skeptical       of arguments made by Jeffrey Kessler, the lawyer for the N.F.L.       Players Association, which was representing Brady.              Of the three judges on the panel, Barrington Daniels Parker Jr.       was the most critical of Brady’s claims. Denny Chin, another       judge, also seemed to have reservations about Kessler’s       arguments. Chief Judge Robert Katzmann appeared to be the most       sympathetic.              http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/sports/football/tom-brady-       deflategate-appeals-court.html?_r=0              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca