Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,523 of 50,863    |
|    Nancy Pelosi Is Also Guilty to All    |
|    Hillary Email Scandal: Clinton Takes Lyi    |
|    24 Jun 17 12:00:39    |
      XPost: az.general, alt.religion.satanism, li.politics       XPost: alt.war.nuclear       From: investigate.pelosi@cnn.com              2016 Election: Maybe it's because she has gotten away with it       for so long, but Hillary Clinton seems to get more brazen in her       mendacity as she gets closer to the White House. Case in point       is her interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News over the weekend.              At one point, Wallace asks Clinton about claims she made about       her use of a private, unsecured email server while secretary of       state, which the FBI investigation determined were completely       false.              Wallace shows clips where Clinton says things like: "I did not       email any classified material to anyone," and "I never sent nor       received any information that was classified at the time," and       "I had not sent classified material nor received anything marked       classified."              Note the subtle change in language between the first and last       claim, which Clinton had to modify after thousands of emails       turned up that the State Department determined to contain       classified information.              But it was all a lie. As FBI Director James Comey pointed out at       his press briefing, out of the 30,000 emails Clinton turned       over, 110 contain "classified information at the time they were       sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information       that was Top Secret at the time they were sent." (Emphasis       added.)              Among the thousands of work emails Clinton failed to turn over --        despite her repeated statements that she had turned over       everything -- "three were classified at the time they were sent       or received."              When Comey testified at a Congressional hearing about his       findings, Rep. Trey Gowdy asked him point-blank where Clinton       was being truthful in her claims. "That's not true," he said.              So what was Clinton's response when Wallace confronted her with       her own quotes, as well as Comey's statement?              "Director Comey said my answers were truthful," she told Wallace.              Let that sink in for a minute.              Her lie was so blatant that even the Washington Post's in-house       fact checker awarded Clinton "Four Pinocchios" -- aka "whoppers."              In her interview with Wallace, Clinton went on to blame the 300       people she emailed with, some of whom, she said, "made the wrong       call" when it came to handling classified material.              But Comey had blown up that defense as well, saying at his press       briefing that she and anyone in her position "should have known       that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation,"       adding that "even if information is not marked 'classified' in       an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject       matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."              In other words, one of those people who "made the wrong call"       was Clinton herself, since she authored some of the classified       emails she sent from her unsecured private email server, and       should have known better. Her statement to Wallace that "I take       classification seriously" looks like just another lie.              Clinton defenders will no doubt respond to this by saying that       "At this point, what difference does it make?" The FBI let       Clinton off the hook. Only her Clinton-hating Republicans       critics won't let it go.              But criminal or not, Clinton's actions when she was secretary of       state -- and her lies and obfuscations about it since -- are       about judgment, honesty and trustworthiness, which are baseline       qualifications for being president.              As she demonstrated again over the weekend, Clinton glaringly       lacks any of these qualities.              http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/hillary-email-       scandal-clinton-takes-lying-to-a-whole-new-level/                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca