XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 9/19/2018 2:18 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   > On 9/19/2018 12:03 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >> On 9/19/2018 11:42 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>> On 9/19/2018 10:50 AM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> {snip}   
   >>>   
   >>>> If there no authority to compel the individual on behalf of the   
   >>>> individual, then there is no authority to compel the individual on   
   >>>> behalf of the nation.   
   >>>   
   >>> I disagree.  Again, consider the military draft.  I suspect you agree   
   >>> there is no authority to compel someone to join the military on   
   >>> behalf of the individual, but there is authority to compel someone to   
   >>> join the military on behalf of the nation.   
   >>   
   >> You didn't answer the questions, therefore I've taken that as your   
   >> implicit admission that there is no such authority to compel the   
   >> individual on behalf of the individual or on behalf of the nation.   
   >   
   > Huh?  I just said there *is* an authority to compel the individual on   
   > behalf of the nation.  And either you agree or you think there is no   
   > authority to compel someone to join the military.  Which is it?   
      
   No, you never answered my questions therefore we revert to my   
   statements, with evidence, as fact.  Your diversion and avoidance have   
   been ignored, as have your baseless statements of fiction.   
      
   My prior response stands: the baker can not be compelled.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)