XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 9/19/2018 2:36 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   > On 9/19/2018 12:03 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >   
   > {snip}   
   >   
   >> If they (the "Liberals and gay activists") demand tolerance of their   
   >> viewpoints and behaviors, then they are under the same obligation to   
   >> be tolerant of others viewpoints and behavior, which means that they   
   >> can not call for boycotting of the baker or other tactics designed to   
   >> interfere with the baker's business.   
   >   
   > Not tolerating a person because they belong to a certain class of people   
   > (what the baker is doing) is far different than not tolerating behavior   
   > (what the boycotters are doing).   
      
   Both are manifestations of intolerance.   
      
   It doesn't matter how different you consider them.  An individual is   
   free to be as tolerant and intolerant has he so chooses, and no   
   individual, group, town, city, state, nation, or world can justifiably   
   compel him otherwise.   
      
   You will disagree with this plain and simple truth.   
      
   Yet you have NOTHING upon which you base your claim.   
      
   N-O-T-H-I-N-G   
      
   Have a nice day!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)