XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: noway@nowhere.com   
      
   On 9/25/2018 1:48 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   > On 9/19/2018 2:36 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >> On 9/19/2018 12:03 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>   
   >> {snip}   
   >>   
   >>> If they (the "Liberals and gay activists") demand tolerance of their   
   >>> viewpoints and behaviors, then they are under the same obligation to   
   >>> be tolerant of others viewpoints and behavior, which means that they   
   >>> can not call for boycotting of the baker or other tactics designed to   
   >>> interfere with the baker's business.   
   >>   
   >> Not tolerating a person because they belong to a certain class of   
   >> people (what the baker is doing) is far different than not tolerating   
   >> behavior (what the boycotters are doing).   
   >   
   > Both are manifestations of intolerance.   
      
   Yes.  One is a good form of intolerance, the other isn't.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)