Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,749 of 50,863    |
|    Josh Rosenbluth to Peter Franks    |
|    Re: 'Bake the cake or else' is back: Bak    |
|    28 Sep 18 22:07:38    |
   
   XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: noway@nowhere.com   
      
   On 9/28/2018 9:33 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   > On 9/28/2018 8:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >> On 9/28/2018 7:32 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>> On 9/25/2018 5:58 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>> On 9/25/2018 1:48 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>> On 9/19/2018 2:36 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 9/19/2018 12:03 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> {snip}   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> If they (the "Liberals and gay activists") demand tolerance of   
   >>>>>>> their viewpoints and behaviors, then they are under the same   
   >>>>>>> obligation to be tolerant of others viewpoints and behavior,   
   >>>>>>> which means that they can not call for boycotting of the baker or   
   >>>>>>> other tactics designed to interfere with the baker's business.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Not tolerating a person because they belong to a certain class of   
   >>>>>> people (what the baker is doing) is far different than not   
   >>>>>> tolerating behavior (what the boycotters are doing).   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Both are manifestations of intolerance.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes. One is a good form of intolerance, the other isn't.   
   >>>   
   >>> LOL! Good form of intolerance?! I've never heard such a moronic   
   >>> statement in my life.   
   >>>   
   >>> You just justified intolerance.   
   >>>   
   >>> What a joke.   
   >>   
   >> I don't tolerate a lot of conduct such as drunk driving, not paying   
   >> your taxes or public nudity. I'm guessing you don't tolerate a lot of   
   >> conduct as well.   
   >   
   > Drunk driving violates the rights of others.   
   >   
   > Not paying your taxes violates the rights of others.   
      
   And public nudity?   
      
   > Does not baking a cake violate the rights of others?   
      
   It depends on the definition of what a right is.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca