XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 9/28/2018 10:07 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   > On 9/28/2018 9:33 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >> On 9/28/2018 8:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>> On 9/28/2018 7:32 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>> On 9/25/2018 5:58 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>>> On 9/25/2018 1:48 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 9/19/2018 2:36 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 9/19/2018 12:03 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> {snip}   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If they (the "Liberals and gay activists") demand tolerance of   
   >>>>>>>> their viewpoints and behaviors, then they are under the same   
   >>>>>>>> obligation to be tolerant of others viewpoints and behavior,   
   >>>>>>>> which means that they can not call for boycotting of the baker   
   >>>>>>>> or other tactics designed to interfere with the baker's business.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Not tolerating a person because they belong to a certain class of   
   >>>>>>> people (what the baker is doing) is far different than not   
   >>>>>>> tolerating behavior (what the boycotters are doing).   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Both are manifestations of intolerance.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yes.  One is a good form of intolerance, the other isn't.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> LOL!  Good form of intolerance?!  I've never heard such a moronic   
   >>>> statement in my life.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You just justified intolerance.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What a joke.   
   >>>   
   >>> I don't tolerate a lot of conduct such as drunk driving, not paying   
   >>> your taxes or public nudity.  I'm guessing you don't tolerate a lot   
   >>> of conduct as well.   
   >>   
   >> Drunk driving violates the rights of others.   
   >>   
   >> Not paying your taxes violates the rights of others.   
   >   
   > And public nudity?   
      
   I don't see what right is violated.   
      
   >> Does not baking a cake violate the rights of others?   
   >   
   > It depends on the definition of what a right is.   
      
   I've defined countless times in this forum: A right is the authority to   
   exercise a power.   
      
   Does not baking a cake violate the rights of others?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)