XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: noway@nowhere.com   
      
   On 10/17/2018 9:51 AM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   > On 9/28/2018 10:07 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >> On 9/28/2018 9:33 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>> On 9/28/2018 8:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>> On 9/28/2018 7:32 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>> On 9/25/2018 5:58 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 9/25/2018 1:48 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 9/19/2018 2:36 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 9/19/2018 12:03 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> {snip}   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> If they (the "Liberals and gay activists") demand tolerance of   
   >>>>>>>>> their viewpoints and behaviors, then they are under the same   
   >>>>>>>>> obligation to be tolerant of others viewpoints and behavior,   
   >>>>>>>>> which means that they can not call for boycotting of the baker   
   >>>>>>>>> or other tactics designed to interfere with the baker's business.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Not tolerating a person because they belong to a certain class   
   >>>>>>>> of people (what the baker is doing) is far different than not   
   >>>>>>>> tolerating behavior (what the boycotters are doing).   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Both are manifestations of intolerance.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes.  One is a good form of intolerance, the other isn't.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> LOL!  Good form of intolerance?!  I've never heard such a moronic   
   >>>>> statement in my life.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You just justified intolerance.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What a joke.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I don't tolerate a lot of conduct such as drunk driving, not paying   
   >>>> your taxes or public nudity.  I'm guessing you don't tolerate a lot   
   >>>> of conduct as well.   
   >>>   
   >>> Drunk driving violates the rights of others.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not paying your taxes violates the rights of others.   
   >>   
   >> And public nudity?   
   >   
   > I don't see what right is violated.   
   >   
   >>> Does not baking a cake violate the rights of others?   
   >>   
   >> It depends on the definition of what a right is.   
   >   
   > I've defined countless times in this forum: A right is the authority to   
   > exercise a power.   
      
   Using that definition, how does not paying your taxes violate the rights   
   of others?   
      
   > Does not baking a cake violate the rights of others?   
      
   I'm not sure until you clarify how not paying taxes violates the rights   
   of others.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)