Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,762 of 50,863    |
|    Peter Franks to Josh Rosenbluth    |
|    Re: 'Bake the cake or else' is back: Bak    |
|    18 Oct 18 09:39:30    |
   
   XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 10/17/2018 2:29 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   > On 10/17/2018 11:45 AM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >> On 10/17/2018 11:15 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>> On 10/17/2018 10:50 AM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>> On 10/17/2018 10:28 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>>> On 10/17/2018 9:51 AM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> {snip}   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> Does not baking a cake violate the rights of others?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I'm not sure until you clarify how not paying taxes violates the   
   >>>>> rights of others.   
   >>>> The right of life, liberty, and happiness are violated:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If one person doesn't pay taxes, they have more free time and income   
   >>>> than the person that must then pay more to compensate.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Assume tax freedom day of April 24 (2015 est.); all days prior to   
   >>>> that are 'tax bondage days'.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you don't pay your taxes, someone else must compensate, and their   
   >>>> tax freedom day extends accordingly. You, by not paying your fair   
   >>>> share of taxes, limits the freedom (liberty) of another in that they   
   >>>> are then obligated to compensate for your abdication of responsibility.   
   >>>   
   >>> It seems to me that not getting that cake negatively impacts on the   
   >>> happiness of the would-be customer.   
   >>   
   >> And not getting $1MM presumably negatively impacts your happiness.   
   >> Are you then going to take, by force, $$ from your rich neighbor? Of   
   >> course not. Try again.   
   >>   
   >> People are free to /pursue/ happiness, but not -- repeat NOT -- demand   
   >> it from others. Try again, again.   
   >>   
   >> What right is violated by not baking a cake?   
   >   
   > I answered the question (negatively impacts the pursuit of happiness,   
   > and as a result harms the nation).   
      
   Are you suggesting that I can demand anyone and everyone provide   
   whatever I desire in my pursuit of happiness?   
      
   > We just happen to disagree on   
   > whether that is a right.   
      
   Disagree on what? The right to compel?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca