Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,866 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,780 of 50,866    |
|    Josh Rosenbluth to Peter Franks    |
|    Re: 'Bake the cake or else' is back: Bak    |
|    31 Oct 18 16:52:09    |
   
   XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: noway@nowhere.com   
      
   On 10/31/2018 3:32 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   > On 10/31/2018 11:31 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >> On 10/31/2018 11:13 AM, Peter Franks wrote:   
      
   {snip}   
      
   >>> You assert that being required to serve is a right of those being   
   >>> served, which NECESSARILY REQUIRES that those that are served have   
   >>> authority over those that serve.   
   >>   
   >> I do not believe it requires those that are served have authority over   
   >> those that serve. Again, this is case of competing rights. The   
   >> customer has the right to pursue happiness, and the baker has the   
   >> liberty right to serve who he wants to. Neither party has authority   
   >> over the other. And yet, the government can choose to secure either   
   >> right it believes takes precedence.   
   >   
   > Does forcing/requiring/mandating someone to do something against their   
   > will require authority over that person?   
      
   Yes.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca