XPost: rec.food.baking, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, misc.legal   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 10/31/2018 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   > On 10/31/2018 3:32 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >> On 10/31/2018 11:31 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>> On 10/31/2018 11:13 AM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >   
   > {snip}   
   >   
   >>>> You assert that being required to serve is a right of those being   
   >>>> served, which NECESSARILY REQUIRES that those that are served have   
   >>>> authority over those that serve.   
   >>>   
   >>> I do not believe it requires those that are served have authority   
   >>> over those that serve.  Again, this is case of competing rights.  The   
   >>> customer has the right to pursue happiness, and the baker has the   
   >>> liberty right to serve who he wants to.  Neither party has authority   
   >>> over the other.  And yet, the government can choose to secure either   
   >>> right it believes takes precedence.   
   >>   
   >> Does forcing/requiring/mandating someone to do something against their   
   >> will require authority over that person?   
   >   
   > Yes.   
      
   Where does that authority come from?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)