Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 50,841 of 50,863    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Colorado Pushes Teachers to Use 'Red Fla    |
|    03 Oct 25 07:56:55    |
      XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, alt.government.employees,       alt.politics.republicans       XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns       From: yourdime@outlook.com              When 'red flag' laws first started popping up around the country,       supporters claimed that these Extreme Risk Protection Orders would be       rarely used, and only in the most serious cases involving individuals who       posed a danger to themselves or others.              As more and more states have adopted these laws, though, anti-gunners have       made it clear that they want to see as many ERPOs filed as possible. The       Minneapolis Star Tribune, for example, just ran a big series on the       state's red flag law that took issue with the fact that the law has yet to       be used in many counties. A lack of "red flag" petitions isn't seen as a       good thing. It's a red flag of its own.              Another example of this is playing out in Colorado, where the state's "red       flag" law was expanded back in 2023 to allow more individuals to file       petitions. Teachers can now file petitions directly instead of going to       law enforcement, school officials, or the parent of a student, but       Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser says not many have done so. Now his       office is offering "training" to educators that encourages them to file       petitions whenever possible.              “Obviously the events of Evergreen are top of mind today,” Weiser said.       “But it’s sadly one painful story after another that schools and       schoolkids have seen too much gun violence.              “When young people are struggling [or] contemplating suicide and make       statements like, ‘I know where my dad keeps the gun’ or ‘I have access to       a gun and I’m going to take my life,’ that’s a call to action. It’s       important we use all the tools we can to prevent gun violence.”              Gun violence is the leading cause of death among youth. In 2023, 21% of       Colorado middle school students reported that they could get a loaded gun       in less than an hour without adult permission, according to the results of       the statewide Healthy Kids Colorado survey.              The training, called the ERPO Curriculum for Educators, consists of two       30-minute virtual sessions. The first session goes over the basics of       Extreme Risk Protection Orders, or ERPOs.              ERPOs allow law enforcement to confiscate a person’s firearms for up to a       year if a judge determines that the person poses a danger to themselves or       others. The second training session provides step-by-step instructions on       how to petition the court for such an order. In addition to educators, a       person’s family or household members, law enforcement officers, medical       and mental health providers, and district attorneys can petition for an       ERPO.              There's an obvious reason why teachers haven't filed a lot of "red flag"       petitions; juveniles who aren't old enough to legally purchase or possess       a firearm aren't going to be impacted by an order that prohibits them from       buying or possessing a gun. As far as I can tell, when juveniles are       subject to an Extreme Risk Protection Order, that doesn't bar their parent       or guardian from continuing to possess firearms. The ERPO statute reads in       part that petitioners must "Identify the number, types, and locations of       any firearms the petitioner believes to be in the respondent's current       ownership, possession, custody, or control."              There's no language in the statute about the respondent's parent or       guardian's guns, so when Weiser insinuates that the use of these "red       flag" laws can stop a juvenile from accessing their mom or dad's gun, I       don't think that's accurate.              The "red flag" law also makes it very clear that the subject of an ERPO       petition must be the one exhibiting signs of danger to themselves or       others, so I don't think Colorado law allows for a "red flag" petition to       be used against a parent or guardian of a troubled juvenile.              I've reached out to an attorney and law enforcement sources in Colorado       for confirmation on whether the parents or guardians of juveniles who are       under a "red flag" petition also have to give up their legally owned       firearms, and I'll update with more information once I hear back. At the       moment, though, it seems to me that Weiser's just looking to pad the       number of "red flag" petitions that are filed, regardless of whether or       not they'll have any real impact on those subject to them. If educators       are truly concerned about one of their juvenile students, the first call       should be to the student's family, and no one should be wasting their time       and energy on an Extreme Risk Protection Order that won't stop a troubled       teen from harming themselves or others.              https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2025/10/01/colorado-pushes-teachers-to-       use-red-flag-law-n1230114              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca