Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 99  |
|  BOB KLAHN to BOB ACKLEY  |
|  Echo Rules  |
|  10 Jan 11 05:35:24  |
 BK>>>> No moderator name entered. No moderator identified. RW>>>> Perhaps if you had a Fidonet nodelist and were able to read it, you RW>>>> could then identify the moderator. TR>>> Klahn just made an attempt to hijack another echo and got TR>>> caught at it. He's now licking his wounds in other echoes. BK>> Richardson is lying. BA> He's telling the absolute truth, Klahn. Everybody that BA> witnessed your hijinks is aware of what you tried to do. And they are aware that you are lying here. Your ignorance may be correctable, but your choice to remain ignorant makes it a lie. BA> Not to mention that Earl saved the netmails he got when BA> Thom's system notified him that somebody was trying to BA> register HIS echo is someone else's name (yours). You Which does not change a thing, as you would know if you were not so ignorant of how Fido works. BA> tried the same trick some time back with POL_INC, and Earl BA> has that netmail too. Had either echo *really* expired as BA> you claim, Thom's system would not have rejected your BA> attempt(s) to claim them. And that is your ignorance. Thom's system works automatically, the elist robot. The echo does not have to be in the last issued Elist to be listed, but the next one. I told you before, look in the elists of the time. He was not listed as moderator. He was listed in the *NEXT* elist, not the last one. And you can't see the next elist until it's published. I checked the elist before attempting to list an echo. You should check it before spouting off on what you don't know. BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg] * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]