MSGID: 1:229/426 568C9DFE
REPLY: 1:153/757.0 51203d81
On 20 Nov 22  13:54:10, Alan Ianson said the following to Nick Andre:

> The reality is that nobody reads messages over 64k, I don't read messages
> over 6.4k for that matter - and Fidonet was never designed for it. 64k was
> never an issue "then" in 1988 and certainly not an issue "now".
AI> 
AI> This message size issue is an old one. It shows itself from time to time.

I know it does. Part of me does not understand why the onus falls on my 
shoulders to handle this instead of the author of the message-posting software
not splitting large messages into managable chunks.

Let me look at the code when I have some time... translation, boredom.

It may only be possible to skip messages beyond 64k; splitting them will be a 
challenge with very little heap-memory to work with and already pushing limits
of what can be done with 640k.

I'm reluctant to start changing code largely untouched for decades.

Nick

--- Renegade vY2Ka2
 * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)