TZUTC: -0300
MSGID: 995.fidonetdbridge@4:902/26 2aa4e6d2
REPLY: 2:292/854 18123a13
PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/8cff92bd1 abr 27 202 GCC 10.2.1
TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/8cff92bd1 abr 27 2024 21:20 GCC 10.2.1
BBSID: DOCKSUD
CHRS: UTF-8 4
El 8/5/24 a las 12:14, Ward Dossche escribió:
> Andrew,
>   
> AL>WD> So why do it? Probably no-one will ever use it...
>   
> AL> It appears there is interest in the BBS community; otherwise the question
>   
> AL> would not have been asked.  I know that I wouldn't mind testing it as a
> AL> means
> AL> of avoiding the known bugs in FastEcho that probably will never be fixed.
>   
> My view on this ... such message-bases came into existence in the days of
limited disc-space to save space.
>   
> Those days are gone and while *.msg generates overhead ... who cares ... ?
> I never understood why anyone want a storage system which could collapse and
make'm lose the entire message base instead of just 1 or 2 messages...
>   

maildir vs mbox war like....
=)
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: Dock Sud BBS - http://bbs.docksud.com.ar (4:902/26)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305
SEEN-BY: 135/220 225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 6
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/550 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 320/219 322/757 341/66 200 234
SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848
SEEN-BY: 770/1 902/26 5020/400 5054/30 5075/35
PATH: 902/26 341/66 280/464 460/58 229/426