XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.democrats, alt.lunatics   
   XPost: alt.california   
   From: x@y.com   
      
   On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:29:37 +0000 (UTC), in talk.politics.guns WEHO   
    wrote:   
      
   >> The objective isn't to "overturn an election" or even to "cleanse the   
   >> office of the presidency" by removing the Donald from office; anybody   
   >> who is able to count will easily see that a two-thirds majority (under   
   >> current partisan conditions, anyway) is completely out of reach.   
   >>   
   >> The objective is to tie him up with investigations.  It might sound   
   >> petty; however, that tactic is tried and true... it even has a name;   
   >> it's called: "denial of service".  Hopefully, it will limit the damage   
   >> he can do until we can vote him out of office.   
   >   
   >You're full of shit.  The Democrat objective from day one of the Trump   
   >presidency has been to befoul it and prevent any progress.   
   >   
   >They have failed miserably.   
   >   
   >Go John Durham.   
      
   That's *exactly* want I just said; although, I didn't say "befoul it";   
   I said that the objective was to "tie him up with investigations"   
   thereby adding confounding factors to his agenda.  As the Republicans   
   learned in 1998, impeachment is fairly easy; in 1999, they learned   
   that getting 2/3 of the senate is a whole different bucket of worms.   
   If we drag out an endless series of investigations into anything we   
   can think of, we can accomplish the same thing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)