Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    dc.politics    |    General havoc in Washington DC    |    48,889 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 47,086 of 48,889    |
|    edell@post.com to All    |
|    Reporting the War on Whites (2/3)    |
|    09 Jan 21 23:35:10    |
      [continued from previous message]              scale Black riots in hundreds of American cities in the mid- to       late-1960s, the liberal analysis of events was encapsulated in       the report of the Kerner Commission. Basically, the blue-ribbon       panel blamed the riots on white racism, excused the rioters, and       urged changes to prevent future outbreaks. Universities, which       became the think-tanks of the Left developed theories to       exculpate Black violence; they were "culturally deprived," they       were victims of institutional racism, and their outbursts were       simply a means to cope with such oppression. Furthermore, Blacks       could not, by definition, be racists. They might show prejudice,       but racism required power, and since Blacks in America lacked       power, they were incapable of being racist. Only white racism       was the problem. Of course, if you walk alone on a street at       night, who has the power, a Black with a pistol, or you? And in       the era of President Obama and Attorney General Holder, who does       have the power? Moreover, if this definition made any sense and       were applied elsewhere, then Afrikaners, by definition, can no       longer be racists in the new South Africa.              The Left-wing theories of race spun by academics were       popularized by the media. In the journalism and communications       departments of universities, students were taught that as       reporters they were to comfort the afflicted and afflict the       comfortable. Objective reporting was deemed not merely old       fashioned, but immoral. The reporter was to take the side of the       oppressed. And in race reporting, that meant coloring the news       for the benefit of Blacks, who were by definition, the       oppressed. And so academe and the media melded into the       academedia complex.              Other issues were also fused with the new, politically correct       mission of the communication majors. For example, as the method       of affirmative action became clearer in practice, (basically a       way to give the job or scholarship to a lesser qualified or       unqualified minority and deny it to the best qualified, if he       were white.) To justify these practices of denying equal       opportunity to whites, the Left developed the theory of "white       male privilege." According to this, all whites were privileged,       and to create a level playing field, preferences had to be       granted to minorities, even rich ones. The whites who did not       understand this justification, were clearly racists, and       probably deserving of a Fanonesque tutoring session (i.e.,       violence).              The curriculum of schools has changed drastically to incorporate       many of the Leftist theories. No longer is the West applauded as       the center of a civilization that freed many men and women of       drudgery, that provided light throughout the night, that sped       people and goods across a continent on rail, and even in the       air, - now the West is depicted as oppressive. Whites smashing       the wonderful civilizations of the Aztecs, of Africa, of       wherever. And white oppression must be fought. Multiculturalism       is the glorification of all cultures - except oppressive,       colonial, racist, white culture. The West became the enemy in       many of America's schools.              So the "youths" who roam about lurking to beat whites (and       sometimes Asians) are simply affirming what they have been       taught in their multicultural curriculum and in the general       media. So, poor, raped, Tawana Brawley - persecuted and raped by       the KKK policeman, for a year was a page-1 story for Rev. Al       Sharpton to inform reporters about the evils of whites. It was a       hoax; but the Left did not care. Think of all the educational       material that Rev. Sharpton could present to the cameras during       that year. And poor, O. J. Simpson - that white bitch of a wife       was receiving OJ's alimony to squander on that Jewish waiter!       They surely deserved what happened to them - whoever might have       killed them. Another big racial even occurred in the Howard       Beach section of New York City in which a Black was killed by       autos as he fled a group of angry white youths. Even a year       following the event, there was a television movie about it to       remind America of white racism and its murderous consequences.       Yet, at about the same time, in Milwaukee a white youth, fleeing       a group of Black youths, jumped in Lake Michigan, and drowned.       There was no publicity about the death of Maldonado in       Milwaukee. Maldonado was just a white. Instead of running to the       lake, he should have simply let the Blacks beat the s___ out of       him, and then he might still be alive. The media and those who       control it could not state blatantly the main difference between       these stories. One is a rare example of white racism; the other       an all too common example of Black racism. The media choose the       spotlight the rare example, hoping to convince that it is the       common type of racism. The media also dismiss the more common       type of racist attacks, because that would show Blacks in an       unfavorable light. The media rationally choose the stories that       they will emphasize. They choose those stories that fit their       ideology. So, they provide massive coverage to one story, and       bury the other.              Even though his mother was white, most people view Barack Obama       is Black. George Zimmerman had a Jewish father and an Hispanic       mother. But for the Leftist media, like CNN, Zimmerman was       identified as the "white" who had brutally murdered the young       Trayvon Martin. The point of the Leftist media was to show a       wicked white racist murdering an innocent young Black. That       story fit the Left-wing agenda. Zimmerman resided in a       neighborhood recently targeted by burglaries. He was part of a       neighborhood watch, seeking to keep his neighborhood safe.       However, the Left objects to that. (To the Left, if you want to       live in a safe neighborhood, get rich and live in a gated       community. The poor, according to the Left, should have to       endure the crazies, the muggers, the rapists, and the Trayvon       Martins.) The Left vigorously opposes the 2nd Amendment and the       right to own arms to defend oneself; one's loved ones, one's       property. Whatever happened in the confrontation between       Zimmerman and Martin, the Left media sensationalized the event       seeking to make it into a racist white killing an innocent       Black. I was not there to witness the event, and it is possible       that Zimmerman shot Martin without provocation. However, there       are other possibilities. Noteworthy, the Martin family has       sought to keep Trayvon's school records sealed. He had been       suspended for several days, and there were indications that he       was involved with drugs and stolen property. Is it not possible       that Trayvon was casing the neighborhood when Zimmerman caught       him? But, young Blacks cannot be guilty when confronting a       "white" (or even an Hispanic-white) according to the ideology       that dominates the academedia complex. Noteworthy also, when the       New Black Panther Party called for the apprehension of       Zimmerman, dead or alive, this threat did not stir the       Department of Justice to protect Zimmerman. After all, Obama       marched beside leaders of the NBPP in Alabama and he also shared       a platform with them. Some members of the NBPP have called for       the murder of all whites, men, women, and children. If Obama       could share a platform with them, and have his Attorney General       Holder dismiss a lawsuit against the NBPP, why would his       Administration object to that party's threats against the       Hispanic Zimmerman?              If our media were doing their jobs properly, there would be no       need for Flaherty's book. Because the media, on race issues, are              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca