home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   dc.politics      General havoc in Washington DC      48,889 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 47,087 of 48,889   
   edell@post.com to All   
   Reporting the War on Whites (3/3)   
   09 Jan 21 23:35:10   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   dominated by Left-wing ideologues, they consciously try NOT to   
   report stories unfavorable to Blacks. When the story becomes too   
   big to suppress, then the media spins it to distort, with the   
   objective to make the Blacks appear in the most favorable light.   
      
   What would happen if the media reported honestly? The Left would   
   have "the community" (Blacks and some radical whites) march on   
   the station, organize boycotts of the sponsors' products, gather   
   signatures from academe and tax-exempt Leftist groups like the   
   NAACP, the ACLU, for law suits, demand firings of the honest   
   reporters, etc. The station would quickly cave, and to prove its   
   sincerity, it would grant a large contribution to some of the   
   protesting organizations, fire the reporter or have him sent to   
   an appropriate re-education center on sensitivity training. The   
   station would also promise that in the future no such honest   
   reports would be aired.   
      
   Sadly, since the 1960s, one cannot report the truth about race   
   and crime in the major media in America. Flaherty's book is not   
   published by a major publisher. One can read about these   
   incidents daily in some internet sites like Jared Taylor's   
   American Renaissance. He includes clips about racial crime in   
   the US, and in addition, racial conflict and crime in Sweden,   
   the UK, the Netherlands, and other nations.   
      
   Those old enough may recall black/white photographs from the   
   1930s of refugees fleeing Nazi Europe. The pictures make one   
   sympathize with the victims of the bullying, belligerence, and   
   terror they endured in storm-troopered Europe. With WWII won,   
   America's economy turned from building tanks to automobiles and   
   consumer goods, and this nation embarked upon a period of great   
   prosperity. Some could now afford cars, and even new homes in   
   the suburbs. But others preferred to remain in the neighborhoods   
   they knew from childhood. They did not want to move to the green   
   burbs; they preferred to stay near the church their parents had   
   helped build, the one in which they had been confirmed, been   
   married, etc. Then came the riots of the late 1960s. The   
   threats, the shots, the burned cars, burned buildings, beatings.   
   The Blacks doing this did not wear fancy storm-trooper uniforms,   
   but they were just as racist, just as threatening, just as   
   brutal. Now many more whites found it necessary to flee the   
   city. Like the Jews of Hitler's Europe, they had to leave,   
   sometimes quite quickly, out of fear. They often suffered   
   financial loss in the process of a fast relocation. Yes, they   
   went to the burbs, and often loved it; like the Jews who came to   
   America and loved it. But many of these whites were driven from   
   their homes. White flight was a reality. While the academedia   
   complex can only envision white racism, it was the brutality of   
   Black racism that caused many to flee. (Jack Cashill's Sucker   
   Punch: The Hard Left Hook that Dazed Ali and Killed King's Dream   
   describes how Black racism led to the collapse of his home   
   neighborhood in Newark, NJ, in the late 1960s.)   
      
   What were whites fleeing? Black racism. Black crime. Black   
   "culture" (loud, noisy music, vulgarity, shouting, arguments,   
   hatred of whites, etc. Why is there such crime? Because liberal   
   judges do not require Blacks to abide by the same rules required   
   of whites. If they commit crimes, their punishment will often be   
   lighter. A Black who attacks a white can get away with it. So   
   why not do it? It will not make news. It is deleted from the   
   newspaper. If it does make news, it will somehow be the white   
   man's fault. The Black is exonerated. OJ was declared not guilty   
   and across the nation Black university students cheered. (Stick   
   it to whitey!)   
      
   Also telling, shortly after being elected President, Ronald   
   Reagan was shot and severely wounded by attempted assassin John   
   Hinckley. The crime occurred in Washington, D.C., a city   
   overwhelmingly Black in population. A jury was selected to hear   
   the case - eleven Blacks and one white. Rather than convict the   
   attempted murderer, the jury found him not guilty due to   
   insanity! Do you think that jury would have reached a similar   
   verdict had Hinckley attempted to assassinate Obama?   
      
   Flaherty writes about the past two years, atrocity after   
   atrocity. So many attacks by Blacks against whites that it no   
   longer seems a tragedy, but a Stalinist statistic. What might   
   the numbers be? Though she includes all crimes and all races,   
   Ann Coulter includes an important paragraph in her new book,   
   Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama -   
   "Between 1960 and 1973, the number of FBI index crimes - which   
   are serious offences such as murder, rape, robbery, arson,   
   assault, kidnapping and burglary - nearly tripled from 2,019,600   
   offences a year to 5,891,924. Hundreds of thousands of Americans   
   had to die, be raped, or have their property destroyed or stolen   
   because liberals had some neat new ideas about crime."(p. 12-13)   
      
   Recall Stalin emphasized how one can conceive of an individual   
   death, but not the death of a million. That is a statistic. Yet,   
   Flaherty's endless recording of one after another attack on   
   whites by Black racists has a more powerful impact. The whole is   
   greater than the sum of its parts. It is not a single incident,   
   but the cumulative effect of reading about attacks on whites by   
   Black racists. Equally important, the equally cumulative effect   
   of the consistent cover-ups and lies by the mass media and the   
   government officials to hide or excuse the Black attacks.   
      
   Happily, not all Blacks have taken up the war against whites.   
   Many Blacks prefer peace with white people. But too often Blacks   
   vote for the liberal politicians and judges who refuse to crack   
   down on Black crime. If they are jurors, they too often vote to   
   let guilty Blacks go free.   
      
   What has happened to America in recent decades is a tragedy. In   
   reality, the elite have encourage Blacks to make war on whites.   
   It is a war consciously ignored by the academedia complex. It is   
   a war encouraged and subsidized by the extremely wealthy   
   foundations (most of which are dominated by the Left). It is at   
   present a one-sided war, for only one groups is involved in the   
   aggression. The other is victimized. The media pretend there is   
   no war. The politicians appease the aggressors. Statistics and   
   tragedies.   
      
   Despite the flaws of typographical errors, misspelt and omitted   
   words, despite the lack of analysis and index, despite the   
   sloppy look and oversized print, White Girl Bleed A Lot provides   
   accurate description of the continuing race war that the   
   mainstream media consciously refuse to report.   
   365 people found this helpful   
      
   https://www.amazon.com/review/R3BU5NUXOJAB9U/ref=cm_cr_pr_viewpnt   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca