Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    dc.politics    |    General havoc in Washington DC    |    48,889 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 47,087 of 48,889    |
|    edell@post.com to All    |
|    Reporting the War on Whites (3/3)    |
|    09 Jan 21 23:35:10    |
      [continued from previous message]              dominated by Left-wing ideologues, they consciously try NOT to       report stories unfavorable to Blacks. When the story becomes too       big to suppress, then the media spins it to distort, with the       objective to make the Blacks appear in the most favorable light.              What would happen if the media reported honestly? The Left would       have "the community" (Blacks and some radical whites) march on       the station, organize boycotts of the sponsors' products, gather       signatures from academe and tax-exempt Leftist groups like the       NAACP, the ACLU, for law suits, demand firings of the honest       reporters, etc. The station would quickly cave, and to prove its       sincerity, it would grant a large contribution to some of the       protesting organizations, fire the reporter or have him sent to       an appropriate re-education center on sensitivity training. The       station would also promise that in the future no such honest       reports would be aired.              Sadly, since the 1960s, one cannot report the truth about race       and crime in the major media in America. Flaherty's book is not       published by a major publisher. One can read about these       incidents daily in some internet sites like Jared Taylor's       American Renaissance. He includes clips about racial crime in       the US, and in addition, racial conflict and crime in Sweden,       the UK, the Netherlands, and other nations.              Those old enough may recall black/white photographs from the       1930s of refugees fleeing Nazi Europe. The pictures make one       sympathize with the victims of the bullying, belligerence, and       terror they endured in storm-troopered Europe. With WWII won,       America's economy turned from building tanks to automobiles and       consumer goods, and this nation embarked upon a period of great       prosperity. Some could now afford cars, and even new homes in       the suburbs. But others preferred to remain in the neighborhoods       they knew from childhood. They did not want to move to the green       burbs; they preferred to stay near the church their parents had       helped build, the one in which they had been confirmed, been       married, etc. Then came the riots of the late 1960s. The       threats, the shots, the burned cars, burned buildings, beatings.       The Blacks doing this did not wear fancy storm-trooper uniforms,       but they were just as racist, just as threatening, just as       brutal. Now many more whites found it necessary to flee the       city. Like the Jews of Hitler's Europe, they had to leave,       sometimes quite quickly, out of fear. They often suffered       financial loss in the process of a fast relocation. Yes, they       went to the burbs, and often loved it; like the Jews who came to       America and loved it. But many of these whites were driven from       their homes. White flight was a reality. While the academedia       complex can only envision white racism, it was the brutality of       Black racism that caused many to flee. (Jack Cashill's Sucker       Punch: The Hard Left Hook that Dazed Ali and Killed King's Dream       describes how Black racism led to the collapse of his home       neighborhood in Newark, NJ, in the late 1960s.)              What were whites fleeing? Black racism. Black crime. Black       "culture" (loud, noisy music, vulgarity, shouting, arguments,       hatred of whites, etc. Why is there such crime? Because liberal       judges do not require Blacks to abide by the same rules required       of whites. If they commit crimes, their punishment will often be       lighter. A Black who attacks a white can get away with it. So       why not do it? It will not make news. It is deleted from the       newspaper. If it does make news, it will somehow be the white       man's fault. The Black is exonerated. OJ was declared not guilty       and across the nation Black university students cheered. (Stick       it to whitey!)              Also telling, shortly after being elected President, Ronald       Reagan was shot and severely wounded by attempted assassin John       Hinckley. The crime occurred in Washington, D.C., a city       overwhelmingly Black in population. A jury was selected to hear       the case - eleven Blacks and one white. Rather than convict the       attempted murderer, the jury found him not guilty due to       insanity! Do you think that jury would have reached a similar       verdict had Hinckley attempted to assassinate Obama?              Flaherty writes about the past two years, atrocity after       atrocity. So many attacks by Blacks against whites that it no       longer seems a tragedy, but a Stalinist statistic. What might       the numbers be? Though she includes all crimes and all races,       Ann Coulter includes an important paragraph in her new book,       Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama -       "Between 1960 and 1973, the number of FBI index crimes - which       are serious offences such as murder, rape, robbery, arson,       assault, kidnapping and burglary - nearly tripled from 2,019,600       offences a year to 5,891,924. Hundreds of thousands of Americans       had to die, be raped, or have their property destroyed or stolen       because liberals had some neat new ideas about crime."(p. 12-13)              Recall Stalin emphasized how one can conceive of an individual       death, but not the death of a million. That is a statistic. Yet,       Flaherty's endless recording of one after another attack on       whites by Black racists has a more powerful impact. The whole is       greater than the sum of its parts. It is not a single incident,       but the cumulative effect of reading about attacks on whites by       Black racists. Equally important, the equally cumulative effect       of the consistent cover-ups and lies by the mass media and the       government officials to hide or excuse the Black attacks.              Happily, not all Blacks have taken up the war against whites.       Many Blacks prefer peace with white people. But too often Blacks       vote for the liberal politicians and judges who refuse to crack       down on Black crime. If they are jurors, they too often vote to       let guilty Blacks go free.              What has happened to America in recent decades is a tragedy. In       reality, the elite have encourage Blacks to make war on whites.       It is a war consciously ignored by the academedia complex. It is       a war encouraged and subsidized by the extremely wealthy       foundations (most of which are dominated by the Left). It is at       present a one-sided war, for only one groups is involved in the       aggression. The other is victimized. The media pretend there is       no war. The politicians appease the aggressors. Statistics and       tragedies.              Despite the flaws of typographical errors, misspelt and omitted       words, despite the lack of analysis and index, despite the       sloppy look and oversized print, White Girl Bleed A Lot provides       accurate description of the continuing race war that the       mainstream media consciously refuse to report.       365 people found this helpful              https://www.amazon.com/review/R3BU5NUXOJAB9U/ref=cm_cr_pr_viewpnt              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca