XPost: us.military.national-guard, alt.politics.democrats.house,   
   alt.politics.media   
   XPost: tx.politics, sac.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.politics.trump, soc.culture.usa, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.law-enforcement, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.philosophy, alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.psychology, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here   
   From: NOT-SURE@ideocracy.gov   
      
   On 1/19/21 7:18 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:   
   > Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) says he finds it "offensive" that the FBI is   
   > vetting National Guard members, including those from Texas, in Washington   
   > ahead of President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration on Wednesday.   
   >   
   > "No one should ever question the loyalty or professionalism of the Texas   
   > National Guard," Abbott wrote in a tweet Monday night.   
   >   
   > There are approximately 25,000 National Guard members in Washington to   
   > secure the inauguration, including about 1,000 from Texas, in response to   
   > the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.   
   >   
   > Abbott wrote he would not deploy the Texas National Guard to Washington   
   > again if they are vetted ahead of the inauguration.   
   >   
   >   
   > Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy told The Associated Press on Sunday that   
   > officials are conscious of the potential threat, and he warned commanders   
   > to be on the lookout for any problems within their ranks as the   
   > inauguration approaches.   
   >   
   > So far, however, he and other leaders say they have seen no evidence of   
   > any threats, and officials said the vetting hadn't flagged any issues that   
   > they were aware of.   
   >   
   > In a situation like this one, FBI vetting would involve running peoples'   
   > names through databases and watchlists maintained by the bureau to see if   
   > anything alarming comes up, according to The Associated Press. That could   
   > include involvement in prior investigations or terrorism-related concerns,   
   > said David Gomez, a former FBI national security supervisor in Seattle.   
      
   It violates the 14th Amendment according to Democrats.  You can't ask if   
   somone is gay or Trans or BLACK and use that as a reason to limit their   
   placement in a position they are working at.   
      
   If so then shouldn't the first people banned by Democrats from the   
   Capital due to spying and attempting to undermine America, be the   
   Muslims and Chinese....  and the Russians?   
      
   Muslims actually killed Americans, wouldn't that means all Muslims have   
   to be vetted to see if they're connected to the Muslim Brotherhood or   
   some other terrorist group? And wouldn't that mean that BLACKS in the   
   NATIONAL GUARD are suspected by DEMOCRATS of being Marxist #BLM terrorists?   
      
   And wouldn't all the BLACK need to be vetted to find the #BLM terrorists   
   in the armed troops who are now occupying the CAPITAL?   
      
      
   --   
   That's Karma   
      
      
                         *Mama'says*   
   Welcome to Marxism, where mediocrity is the highest achievement   
   possible.  -BMUS-   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)