Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    dc.politics    |    General havoc in Washington DC    |    48,889 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 48,693 of 48,889    |
|    Chips Loral to All    |
|    Citizen Kaine was almost as big a luser     |
|    12 Aug 24 12:59:37    |
      XPost: az.politics, dfw.politics, chi.politics       XPost: houston.politics, can.politics       From: loralandclinton@invalid.co              Minus the stolen valor and the rest of the deceitful paramilitary       gaslighting Tampon Tim has.              Demotards could have picked worse with Gavin Newscum, but not a lot       worse than this:              https://redstate.com/streiff/2024/08/12/tim-walz-called-national       guard-troops-as-19-year-old-cooks-when-refusing-to-deploy-them-i       -minneapolis-n2178008              As Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and his police chief were frantically       calling Governor Tim Walz in the summer of 2020 to save a besieged       police precinct, Governor Tim Walz refused to send National Guard       soldiers to help the beleaguered police officers. Later, in       rationalizing and justifying his conscious decision to let riots       metastasize, Walz said the Guard wasn't up to the task.              He went on to say, "Putting a young troop with limited experience in the       military with a loaded automatic weapon in the middle of a system with       no one giving him direction -- they don’t have zip ties. They don’t have       legal authority,"              That was on Wednesday, by the time Walz finally authorized the       deployment of "19-year-old" cooks, the Minneapolis Third Precinct had       been sacked, and the riots were widespread.              As a former National Guardsman, Walz's answers and responses sound       blatantly dishonest. He should have trained in crowd control at some       point in his career and would have known that you don't put troops on       the streets with automatic weapons until things have gone pear-shaped in       a major way. From personal experience, I was deployed as part of an       Operation GARDEN PLOT exercise to secure a real nuclear weapons storage       facility against a sizeable force of role-players. Even under those       circumstances, I had a strict progression in the use of force to follow.       You didn't load weapons until you were in extremis. I find it hard to       believe that an organization that has managing civil disturbances as a       primary mission would not have rules on the use of force.              When Walz bailed out of his National Guard unit rather than deploy to       Iraq, his unit, a field artillery battalion, was tasked with providing       convoy security. Among them were 19-year-olds who had been trained for       something entirely different. And some of the men Walz abandoned didn't       come home. Including at least one 19-year-old.              Walz’s old unit, whose main job was running security for US convoys in       Iraq, suffered three casualties during the deployment he missed —       including Kyle Miller, 19, who joined the National Guard while still in       high school, and David Berry, 37.              Soldiers are as good as their leaders. When you find a leader who is not       willing to trust his troops with a mission, that judgment is rendered on       the leader, not on the troops. The Guardsmen who successfully performed       their mission in Minneapolis were the same troops that Walz refused to       send on Wednesday. They were no better trained and no better led. Walz       denigrated their ability to do their job as an excuse not to do his. As       it turns out, that is on-brand for Walz.              https://thelibertydaily.com/more-scandal-tim-walz-lied-20th-anniversary-9/              (America First Report)—Minnesota Governor and Democrat VP nominee Tim       Walz is a liar. His service as a member of the National Guard was       fruitful… just not nearly as exciting as he makes it out to be.              The latest odd and confusing tale comes from a resurfaced speech he       delivered on September 11, 2021; a PDF is available on the Minnesota       government website. It was the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist       attacks. An interesting segment of his speech stood out for two reasons.       Here is the portion in question [emphasis added]:              In the years after that classroom, I had the privilege of serving in       this state’s national guard. I stood one night in the dark of night on       the tarmac at Bagram Air Base in Iraq and watched a military ramp       ceremony–a soldier’s body being loaded onto a plane to be returned home.       And if you’ve seen it, you don’t leave the same. It makes you wonder,       what are we doing? What are we trying to get to? And then watching as       all of you have been, the confusing last few weeks with the Taliban       takeover of Afghanistan.              There are two problems with his statement. By saying that he had the       privilege of serving in the National Guard and then telling the story of       watching a military ramp ceremony implies that the two are related. That       was his intention, otherwise he would have noted his time in Congress       during which he attended a military ramp ceremony as a member of a       delegation. Instead, he wanted listeners to believe he was with the       National Guard while in the Middle East watching the ceremony.              Here’s the video of Walz giving the speech itself. He doesn’t just       mention being in the National Guard before telling of the military ramp       ceremony. He took it a step further by talking of the “guilt” he felt in       being able to come home knowing so many others didn’t, insinuating that       he had “come home” from deployment in the Middle East, which never       actually happened.                     The second error in his speech, which was written but not spoken, was       saying the air base is in Iraq. Bagram Air Base is in Afghanistan.       Details matter, especially when speaking from a position of authority on       a matter.              After many examples of Walz claiming either directly or indirectly that       he is a war veteran who saw combat, the Democrat party and the       mainstream media continue covering for him.              However, the incident underscores the delicate nature of discussing       military service, especially in the context of solemn remembrances like       those for 9/11.              While the controversy may fade, it highlights the intense scrutiny faced       by public figures, especially when it comes to their service records.       For Walz, a simple slip of the tongue or a minor factual error turned       into a significant political issue.              Don’t believe it? Download the full pdf here.              If this was an isolated incident, we could give him the benefit of the       doubt that he simply failed to transition between mentioning being in       the military and telling the story about Bagram. But Walz has       demonstrated multiple times that he intentionally keeps his service       record hazy at best, distorted at worst. He has implied seeing combat,       which he never did. He has claimed to be retired with a rank that he       lost. He pretends he didn’t know about deploying to Iraq before       retirement despite many of those around him at the time debunking him.              Tim Walz is a liar and a bad one at that. We should appreciate his              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca