XPost: misc.legal, alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   From: yourdime@outlook.com   
      
   In a development that should send chills down the spine of every American   
   who cares about the rule of law, Judge James Boasberg — you remember this   
   guy, right? — has somehow ended up with case after case involving   
   President Donald Trump's second term.   
      
   The D.C. swamp's judicial machine continues its relentless assault on our   
   duly elected president, with Boasberg emerging as its not-so-secret   
   weapon. The so-called "random" assignment system has produced results that   
   defy probability and reek of deliberate manipulation.   
      
   The good news is that House Republicans are fighting back.   
      
   Reps. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Darrell Issa (R-Calif), and Chip Roy (R-Texas)   
   are demanding answers from Angela Caesar, the court clerk who oversees   
   this suspicious case assignment system. In a letter that Townhall obtained   
   on Monday, they are demanding explanations for what any rational observer   
   would recognize as a coordinated effort to undermine the Trump presidency.   
      
   "Many of these nationwide injunctions have raised concerns that Article   
   III judges are exceeding their constitutional authority by replacing the   
   policy decisions of the duly elected President with their own preferences,   
   eroding public trust in the integrity and fairness of our judicial system.   
   Many high-profile cases challenging policy decisions of the Trump   
   Administration have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District   
   of Columbia (District Court)," the letter states. "As Congress considers   
   potential legislative reforms to address the abuse of nationwide   
   injunctions and adjust the national distribution and local assignment of   
   cases challenging Executive Branch policy decisions, we write to request   
   information about the District Court’s assignment of cases."   
      
   Related: Trump Just Got a Game-Changing Legal Victory   
      
   Boasberg has been handed several significant cases within a remarkably   
   short timeframe relating to the Trump administration. His docket now   
   includes cases challenging the administration's implementation of the   
   Alien Enemies Act for deportations, as well as matters concerning   
   administration officials' use of the Signal app, both assigned less than   
   two weeks apart. But that's not all.   
      
   The judge is also overseeing cases involving the Department of Government   
   Efficiency and disputes over federal funding for programs allegedly   
   violating civil rights laws (though the latter was dismissed at the   
   plaintiff's request). While the D.C. District Court's local rules govern   
   case assignments, the concentration of such politically sensitive matters   
   under one judge has sparked legitimate questions about the process. The   
   timing and clustering of these assignments demand closer scrutiny.   
      
   Last month, the House passed critical legislation aimed at restraining   
   these activist judges who have abandoned their constitutional role in   
   favor of political warfare. But is it too little, too late? The Left's   
   judicial assault continues unabated while the mainstream media yawns or   
   actively cheers it on.   
      
   The American people deserve to know: Who is pulling the strings behind   
   these courthouse doors? How deep does this corruption go? Furthermore,   
   will anyone be held responsible for the misuse of our judicial system   
   against the President of the United States?   
      
   The D.C. swamp's manipulation of our judicial system continues unchecked.   
      
   https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/05/05/this-one-judge-keeps-getting-   
   trump-cases-and-its-no-accident-n4939502   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)