RE: You posting in 2098 and 1985 and in my echo and your echo
 etc.

 You have double posted several messages in this echo. If you
 can't get that right don't bitch about what your BBS says about
 when you posted.

>>>> That was not a ruling. That was advice to Richardson.

>>> It was your official interpretation of the rule, and it
>>> makes the rule moot.

>> No, it was not. There is no rule against anyone reading the
>> echo, that was advice to stop doing so.

 EC> As usual, you pretend to miss the point.  You ruled that if
 EC> anyone feels they are being provoked in your echo they
 EC> should react by not reading the provocation.  That makes
 EC> Peter's provocation rule moot, just as it makes the rule
 EC> about personal attacks moot.  This was already explained
 EC> more thoroughly. You just ignored it.  Nothing new.

 EC> --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 EC>  * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)