home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 3147 
 BOB KLAHN to EARL CROASMUN 
 Stay home! 
 14 Oct 13 13:30:10 
 
>>>> You posted it in the Debate echo. I returned it here.
>>>> Debate Echo msg 1620 on Docsplace, Sept 3, 2013.

>>> You are talking about a post that appeared in your echo on
>>> 9/3/2013, at 11:24 AM.  I posted it in THIS echo on
>>> 9/2/2013, at 7:23 PM (#4997).

>>> Which leads to a somewhat obvious question: how dumb ARE
>>> you?

>> How did it wind up in the Debate echo?

 EC> YOUR explanation seems to be that I posted the message in
 EC> my echo via the Prism BBS at 11:24 AM on September 3, 2013.

 Your statement is deceptive. I was going to say deliberately
 deceptive, but I realized you may not be thinking clearly.

 I never said a word about the Prism BBS. I do not access the
 Prism BBS, and know nothing about the Prism BBS other than it
 exists.

 I said it appeared in the Debate echo. Your response seems to
 imply I am supposed to know it was somehow cross posted there.
 Your response is pure BS.

 EC>  And then I patiently waited until Jan. 1, 2098, at exactly
 EC>  zero o'clock, to repost the same thing in your echo via

 I still haven't figured out how you posted anything in 2098. I
 just rechecked my archives, I find no reference to 2098.

 EC>  the Prism BBS.  If that is true, you aren't going to READ
 EC>  IT for another 85 years! And yet you seem certain that you
 EC>  will still be the moderator of that echo in the year 2098!

 Where did you see the year 2098 mentioned? The only place I see
 it is in your messages.

 Just to make sure, I went back on Docsplace, reset my message
 pointers to the last Oct packet I downloaded, and re-downloaded
 everything from there up to date. I then searched for the number
 2098. The only place I see the year 2098 is in your messages.

 Do you have sufficient intelectual capacity to understand that
 something might have happened to it in the Prism BBS system?

 EC> Indirectly, you are answering my question.  You aren't
 EC> coming right out and SAYING how dumb you are, but you are
 EC> demonstrating it.

 Actually, all you are doing is demonstrating how dumb you are.
 You are so desperate for someway to look like you are winning an
 arguement that you are inventing a reason for a personal attack.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca