>>> I was laughing about Klahn echoing Krugman.  He agrees, and
>>> quibbles about the timing of his post.  I don't care if it

>> Which is a lie. I refuted his claim I took two weeks.

 EC> Once again Bobzo calls a true statement a "lie."  You might

 Once again Earlie calls a lie a true statement.

 EC> think that he is being loose with his word choice, but he
 EC> might also be trying to pretend that he does not know what
 EC> the word "lie" means.  He has done so in the past.

 Earl lies again.

 EC> I indicated when Krugman's column came out.  I indicated
 EC> when Bobzo echoed it into Fidonet.  He misuses the word
 EC> "lie" AND the word "refuted" AS WELL.

 Earl loves to spin things. I never challenged his claim about
 when Krugman's column came out, I said I did not agree about me
 "echoing" Krugman.

 Yet, Earlie keeps going back to the time it came out, and
 ignores what I really said. I did point out that it came out,
 here, a couple days before my response.

 Yet, Earlie keeps repeating the lie that I agreed with his claim
 that I 'echoed' Krugman.




BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)