>> But now you have been taught that the tax increase was only
>> a part of that supposed "165 billion."  I even explained
>> exactly what years saw a tax increase from the 1983 law,
>> and what years saw NO increase over the 1977 Carter tax
>> increases that were already slated to go into effect.  If
>> you had just paid attention, you would have learned
>> something.

> Now you are playing a word game, pretending a tax increase today
> doesn't count if it was already schedualed for 5 years from now.

If you had actually read what I said, and if you had even a low level of
understanding of the English language, you would realize I said the opposite.
Did you not read it, or did you not understand?  There is no third option
other than your complete dishonesty.

I pointed out to you weeks ago which three years actually saw a tax increase
due to the 1983 law.  You have yet to show any sign that you read it, let
alone understood it, let alone being able to honestly admit it.


--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)