-=> TIM RICHARDSON wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-

 TR> @MSGID: <534EECB9.198.2debate@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>
 TR> @TZ: 40f0
 TR> On 04-15-14, ROY WITT said to BILL MCGARRITY:


 BM> Roy, you need to go back and take a refresher course on reading
 BM> comprehension. IF you got your head out of your ass you'd have seen I
 BM> referenced a doctor on the very site that Tim plagerized,


 TR> *Tim* didn't "...plagiarize..." anything! I was ``quoting'' an
 TR> authority on the subject. *You* are no such authority, on ANY subject!

Then post a link you used.

Plagerize: (verb) take (the work or an idea of someone else) and pass it off as
one's own. Did you mention the author at all?  If not, you stole it.



 RW>Tim didn't plagerize that site, he used " ", nor did you supply a link to
 RW>what you were babbling on about.


 BM>  WebMd and the doctor reiterated my position that the pill is not a
 BM> 100% guarantee the egg won't get fertilized.

 RW>Without a link, this is just blowing in the wind.

 BM> Do you now doubt the words of a learned professional in the field of
 BM> medicine?


 TR> A "WebMd"? You are saying you are quoting a "WebMd"?

You did.... I posted the link you stole it from wordfor word.


 RW>Without a link to the actual statement, coming from you, I would doubt
 RW>that the moon isn't made of cheese if you said so.


 RW>> The manufacturers describe what is in their pill, what it does and
 RW>> the theory of how it works to use it to prevent a pregnancy.


 RW>> Planned Parenthood warns that if you don't take your BC pill
 RW>> everyday at the same time of day, 1-in-100 of those who don't may
 RW>> get pregnant each year. Not will, but maybe.


 BM> Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.


 TR> Planned Parenthood claims to be `an authority'. In fact..Planned
 TR> Parenthood SUPPORTS your oft-stated position; abortion without
 TR> restriction.

Tim, you really need a course in irony.  Think before you put your fingers in
motion.


 RW>And offering a link to what they have to say about it. You haven't and you
 RW>never have.


 BM> Guess when they suit your needs you'll use them.


 TR> You use all sorts of sources you never even name!

Oh?  At what are all those http:// references?  Or do you need a refresher
course in reading comprehension as well?


 RW>Since they're of your own ilk, how can you doubt their word?



 BM> How convinent. I'll need to remember that the next time you said
 BM> planned parenthood are just another liberal backed socialistic
 BM> program.


 TR> Thats exactly what it is. Its an abortion mill. And one day I fully
 TR> expect that horror stories that rival or surpass what was revealed
 TR> about Gosnell's death camp, will surface about Planned Parenthood,
 TR> which the democrat leftists have been financing with taxpayers money!

Gosnell again... is that all you got?  I told you 4 days ago no one doubts
Gosnell was an animal.  And trust me, if the GOP gets it's way and repeals Roe
v Wade, you think Gosnell was an animal?  Wait till you see al those botched
back alley ones. You should know better than anyone what went on before Roe v
Wade.  

 BM> Tim should have, according to Tim's own beliefs, recused himself due
 BM> to morality grounds according to the 1st Amendment he tosses so
 BM> freely around.


 TR> *You* have not the slightest notion what *Tim's own beliefs* are. I
 TR> have never discussed any of my `beliefs' with you, or anyone else in
 TR> Fido.

LOL... you've only been preaching them over and over... good Lord man.  Are you
senile now?


 TR> This is a silly attempt on your part to play a `gotcha' on me over
 TR> abortion.

 TR> You've dragged it over about three Fido echoes now, and you have no
 TR> more validity in the matter here than you had in the other two echoes.
 TR> You didn't `gotcha' anybody over it. You're just continuing to make
 TR> yourself look sillier and sillier. You tried to hit me over it using
 TR> religion, which you thought I would be a strong adherent to. You were
 TR> proven wrong! Fact is...if it were up to me, no religion would exist!
 TR> Or are you so blind that you do not see that we are being treated to
 TR> the modern-day version of the `Spanish Inquisition'?

The post I made in Fido Sysops was a mistake, I apologized and being you don't
have access to there told Roy to forward it to you. Roy then posted it in
DEBATE.... not me. 

 TR> Only the religion involved now is not radical Catholicism...its radical
 TR> Islam?

Radical being the key word.

 TR> There's no getting around the fact that there are over 50 million
 TR> VICTIMS of abortion.


 TR> The best of all birth controls is `abstinance'!

Agreed. Now understand, by that simple statement you agree that while a woman
is on birth control there is a possibility an egg can get fertilized.  


 TR> The SECOND best birth control is the use of the MANY methods, both pill
 TR> form and contraceptive device, available to prevent a pregnancy!

Correct, and one of the ways is to make the lining of the uterus inhospitable
for a fertilized egg.

 TR> You and your fellow cadre who are so supportive of `a woman's right to
 TR> abortion', have not answered the one question I've asked over and over
 TR> again for many years on this subject:


 TR> If a woman is so weak-minded...so scatter-brained...so wrapped up in
 TR> her `emotions' that she can't take a single, in-expensive pill each
 TR> day, AS directed on the freekin' package, or make sure her sex partner
 TR> uses a condom.. ...what makes anybody think she's smart enough to make
 TR> a life-or-death decision for a human baby?

That's not what we were discussing.  The discussion was YOU administered birth
control pills thus going against your morals when it comes to terminating a
life, that being the life as I've explained over and over again on one of the
was the pill works.  


 TR> For that matter...what makes anyone think she's smart enough to make
 TR> the decision to have sex relations in the first place!

What makes you smart enough to make that decision for her?  Are you not a
believer in the 1st Amendment.  You certainly toss it around enough when it
suits your needs regarding religion.

 TR> Its been said many times, by many feminists and TV talk-show hosts;
 TR> making the decision to have sex with a male of her choice is an
 TR> important decision for a woman!

True, and it's just as an important decision for the man to have sex with the
woman as well... unless you're one of those "guys" who take NO to really mean
yes.
 

 TR> The decision to end the life of a baby forming in the womb is even MORE
 TR> important!

Agreed, yet you gave pills to mentally handicapped women where the possibility
of a fertilized egg would be expelled due to that very pill you administered.  

 TR> And neither you, nor any other strong supporter of a woman's *right* to
 TR> abortion...can get around that!

Sure we can and will.  SCOTUS gave women the right to.  Are you saying the
SCOTUS is wrong?


Tim, you've tried over and over again to make your boat float with absolutely
no success.  There are only three reasons why you can't understand one of the
effects of birth control pills can be the expelling of a fertilized eggblinding
you, one... you have been so indoctrinated and your tunnel vision is blinding
you, two, you have a reading comprehension issue or your optometrist gave, you
the wrong persciption for your reading glass.  Either way I don't give a shit
and I'm done here.  

(N)ext...


Bill

Telnet: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


... Motorcycles are everywhere... Look twice, save a life!!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
 * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)