03 Nov 16 13:26, you wrote to Tim Richardson:

 TR>> GD>Not even remotely possible....
 TR>> GD>As I do not subscribe to the network of Dovenet.
 TR>>
 TR>>
 TR>> I just thumbed back through the `Dovenet' list, saw the `dovenet
 TR>> `Debate' echo, and you're there plain as day!

 GD> There has to be another explaination here of messages written here in
 GD> the area somehow making their way into the dovenet debate,

that's easy... someone has crosslinked the areas by putting the posts from
each network into the same message base on their system... AFAIK, the /only/
system that should be putting dovenet message areas into fidonet is digital
mans's system... no other system should be trying to gate between dovenet and
fidonet... if they are, they need to stop... the trick is to find that system
and correct that system's operator's thought processes and setup ;)

 GD> I would imagine someone has something configured incorrectly,

not incorrectly... but they should not be attempting to gate dovenet and
fidonet... crosslinking the message areas is a form of gating but it is not
the proper way to gate the two networks...

 GD> something along those lines or closely related to that, because I do
 GD> not have dovenet connected here, I carry all of fidonet and I
 GD> subscribe to FSXNET which is Paul Hayton's network out of New Zealand.

 GD> I will investigate my node in fidonet is 1:267/150 what do the seen
 GD> by's show.?

seenbys only show the distribution... the path shows the umm... path that the
message followed... QWK networking doesn't have a path line... if mr tim can
see the path line on the duplicated messages, it will show the origin on the
fidonet side where the improper gating is being done...

NOTE: mr tim is a southern way of showing respect to others... it is in no way
a derrogatory thing...

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... Walk in Beauty, dance with the Clouds
---
 * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)