INTL 255:255/0 255:255/999
REPLYADDR achung@EmoryCardiology.com
REPLYTO 255:255/999.0 UUCP
MSGID: <4due3kh0eo31ff7bc10nvdl0ijbs69ct2t@4ax.com> 50e99438
REPLY:  41e34f49
PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
CHRS: LATIN-1 2
From: HeartDoc Andrew 
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology,alt.atheism,alt.support.diabetes,sci.med,alt.
christnet.christianlife
Subject: Breaking pandemic news --> We are 100% certain that MichaelE does **
not** have COVID-19 today (05/28/25) ...
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 17:04:50 -0400
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <4due3kh0eo31ff7bc10nvdl0ijbs69ct2t@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 169
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 21:04:50 +0000
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
X-Received-Bytes: 10096
Xref: news.neodome.net sci.med.cardiology:83361 alt.atheism:1034658 alt.
support.diabetes:33887 sci.med:5469 alt.christnet.christianlife:286354
XPost: sci.med.cardiology, alt.atheism, sci.med
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>  Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias
makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/
>>>
>>> Re Abortion: Another “Bias Makes You Stupid” Op-Ed in the NYT
>>> May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> It’s kind of funny when headline writers are so clueless and biased that
>>> what they think is a “res ipsa loquitur” story proving one thing
>>> actually reveals something completely different.
>>>
>>> The headline on a Times op-ed ed last week was “A Brain-Dead Woman Is
>>> Being Kept on Machines to Gestate a Fetus. It Was Inevitable.” (I’m
>>> using my last gift link of the month on this one, so you’d better read
>>> it!) The writer was Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School.
>>>
>>> The entire piece radiates contempt for the concept of treating the
>>> unborn as human lives, which, you know, they are and rather undeniably
>>> so. Readers are informed that Adriana Smith is brain dead, and has been
>>> connected to life support machines for more than 90 days to save the
>>> life of her baby. Smith was nine weeks pregnant when she died from
>>> multiple blood clots in her brain.
>>>
>>> “Her fetus’s heart continued to beat,” writes the professor, as if it
>>> was an abandoned car with a functioning carburetor. Georgia, she
>>> explains, is one of those crazy, fetus-worshiping states where a nascent
>>> human being is deemed a human life that can’t be snuffed out on a whim
>>> if it has a heartbeat. This, to the op-ed’s author, the headline writer
>>> and the New York Times is completely unfathomable.
>>>
>>>
>>> “Legislators did not seem to have considered a situation in which a
>>> pregnant woman is legally dead,” she sneers. Funny, I don’t see why the
>>> death of the mother compels the decision that the child she is carrying
>>> should be considered a non-person and a life not worth saving. The
>>> professor quotes the dead woman’s mother as saying, “We want the baby.
>>> That’s a part of my daughter. But the decision should have been left to
>>> us — not the state.” Wait: don’t we all believe that it is a proper
>>> function of the state to protect the lives of human beings and to pass
>>> laws that embody that duty? Do families have the option of letting the
>>> children of parents who are killed die from neglect because it’s the
>>> family’s “choice”?
>>>
>>>
>>> What is stunning (depressing, annoying, telling) about Mutcherson’s
>>> essay is that she can’t grasp why anyone would argue that a brain dead
>>> mother should be kept alive so a vulnerable human being can become
>>> strong enough to live a life outside her womb. Many quotes in the op-ed
>>> make that clear, like…
>>>
>>> “Reproductive justice advocates have long been clear that abortion law
>>> is never only about abortion. It is about the exercise of control over
>>> all pregnant women, regardless of whether they plan to carry their
>>> pregnancies to term. That’s why the anti-abortion movement has pursued a
>>> broad agenda of legal personhood for embryos and fetuses.” My comment:
>>> “The Horror”! These misguided people think that a human being’s life
>>> should be saved if at all possible. The monsters! This is the “It isn’t
>>> what it is,” “Handmaiden’s Tale” propaganda of the political left, not
>>> objective analysis. Anti-abortion advocates think that living human
>>> beings shouldn’t be killed, that’s all. The position has nothing to do
>>> with “controlling” the people who want to kill them any more than laws
>>> against murder are “about the exercise of control” over citizens who
>>> would like to kill someone.
>>> “This kind of catastrophic event was inevitable, given the expansive and
>>> imprecise laws written by legislators who generally lack medical
>>> expertise, and the inability of politicians to fully predict every
>>> emergency situation.” My comment: The professor isn’t referring to the
>>> mother’s death as the “catastrophic event,” but rather the brain dead
>>> woman’s body being kept functioning so her baby can be born. I can
>>> conceive of valid arguments for why this should be considered bad policy
>>> or a situation requiring special legislation. But what’s the
>>> catastrophe? The author is incapable of comprehending that in a
>>> utilitarian analysis, a Kantian analysis favoring human life, and
>>> reciprocity principles (“If you were the fetus, what would you want the
>>> hospital to do?”), the situation is thoroughly defensible.
>>> “Emory University Hospital, once Ms. Smith’s place of employment, would
>>> not be legally allowed to remove organs from a brain-dead person without
>>> family consent if this person hadn’t previously registered her wish to
>>> be a donor, even if doing so could save or improve dozens of lives.
>>> However, according to Ms. Smith’s mother, the hospital informed her
>>> that, because of the fetus her daughter was carrying, it could not
>>> legally withdraw the artificial means of keeping her body functioning.”
>>> My comment: So? The professor thinks that’s an apt analogy: the dead
>>> woman’s organs can’t be harvested without her prior consent, so they
>>> will be allowed to die along with her. But a liver isn’t a human being.
>>> Never mind; abortion advocates can’t concede that what is at stake in an
>>> abortion decision is a second human life. If they do, they know what
>>> abortion becomes.
>>> “Knowing the tremendous work that the body of a pregnant woman must do
>>> to sustain and nourish a pregnancy, the harm to the fetus from being
>>> trapped inside a body without a functioning brain cannot be known with
>>> certainty.” My comment: Consequentialism, the refuge of the ethically
>>> inert: “It’s a bad decision because it might not work.”
>>> Mutcherson concludes by calling the situation “dystopian”—there’s “The
>>> Handmaiden’s Tale” mentality again. She can see no benefit or reason to
>>> try to save a human life. Bias has not only rendered her stupid, but so
>>> morally and ethically blind she can’t see the other side of a genuine
>>> ethics conflict.
>>
>> "It's written that GOD punished David&Bathsheba w/ a full-term
>> abortion for their adultery. Thus, abortion reminds us that the
>> adultery of http://AntiChrist45.com (#TrumpIsTheAntiChrist) is the sin
>> to stop..."
>>
>> Source:
>> https://x.com/WDJW/status/1926364784917676335
>>
>> The absolutely only godly way to stop the sin of adultery (thereby
>> stopping abortions) is by holding up our #1 Example of living
>> http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3).
>
>    Indeed.
>
>>
>> Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
>> right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
>> also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
>    I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

USENET source:
https://newsgrouper.org/sci.med.cardiology/205015/205024

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2028 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: SpaceSST BBS Usenet  Fidonet Gateway (255:255/999)
SEEN-BY: 18/200 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110
SEEN-BY: 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 114 206 317 426 428 470 550
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 255/999 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 255/999 229/206 426