TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0100
CHRS: UTF-8 2
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
MSGID: 2:280/464 61db284b
REPLY: 1:3634/12.73 61db1a6e
Hi mark,

On 2022-01-09 12:21:24, you wrote to me:

 WV>> Maybe that was a good idea in 1987, when Fidonet was totally
 WV>> different. But it is not current practice for the ELIST.

 ml> i said it was one reason for listing non-distributed echotags... i didn't
 ml> say anything about it being current practise... other reasons are for
 ml> ownership and archives...

Ownership of a dead area? What's the point?

The (current) ELIST is not for archiving. It's for listing active areas IMHO...

 ml> there are others, as well...

Well please mention them. I don't see it...

 ml> whether you agree with them or not is another matter...

;)

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 114/705 120/340
SEEN-BY: 123/120 131 124/5016 129/305 153/250 757 7715 154/10 203/0
SEEN-BY: 218/840 220/70 221/0 226/17 30 227/114 229/110 200 424 426
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/5832 249/206 317 400 250/5 8 266/512 267/800
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/854 8125 298/25 301/1 305/3 310/31
SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280
SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 100 330 340 772/220 230 2452/250
PATH: 280/464 770/1 317/3 229/426