On 04 Dec 96 15:11, Richard Webb wrote to Andrew Leary:

 RW>> As I read the rules of the echo under discussion, I note
 RW>> that it's implied that access is restricted to certain
 RW>> individuals but nowhere is it stated explicitly that the
 RW>> echo may not be made publicly available on a read-only
 RW>> basis.

 AL>> The moderator should update the echo rules to state the restrictions
 AL>> explicitly. If this is not done, then it will be very difficult to
 AL>> cut the leak's feed, once it is determined where the leak is.

 RW> My thoughts on this as well.

Being as how the echo in question is moderated by a member of the NAB,
cutting a feed on that system shouldn't be a problem. If the mod doesn't
get any cooperation from a downlink, they can just cut that node off.


            R\%/itt


   NASCAR - Everything else is JUST a game? AHRA? IHRA? NHRA? INDY? F1?


--- Hate Mongers and Morons, get your coffee and keyboards ready!
 * Origin: Texas Lone-Star - Texan, American, USAian  (1:387/22)