Hello Robert!

22 Jan 16 12:10, you wrote to all:

 RW> This netmail should have been routed through 618:100/1 instead of
 RW> 1:116/116 -- my Fidonet NC.  Here is my EZYPACK.CTL file:

  I'm not the best at netmail, but let me try.

 RW> 1:116/116
 RW> 1:261/38
 RW> 1:123/10
 RW> 618:100/1
 RW> 1:* VIA 1:116/116
 RW> 2:* VIA 1:116/116
 RW> 3:* VIA 1:116/116
 RW> 4:* VIA 1:116/116
 RW> 5:* VIA 1:116/116
 RW> 6:* VIA 1:116/116
 RW> 618:* VIA 618:100/1

 RW> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

  Here is mine:  This is how I did Micronet back when I was a HUB for that
network.  It's currently commented out, but you can figure it out. :)


; Nick Andre (for all other mail) 1:* 2:* 3:* 4:* 5:* 6:* VIA 1:229/426 ; ;
Micronet Hubbing/Routing ; My Nodes ;618:400/10 VIA 618:400/10 ;618:400/12 VIA
618:400/12 ; Sean Dennis ;618:* VIA 618:618/1 ;

Shawn

... An argument is where two people are trying to get the LAST word in FIRST!
---
 * Origin: The Point of it all (1:229/452.1)