Why am I not surprised? As you may have heard, this past Friday the
Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted against a bill
which would have strengthened the concept of what has been termed "Net
Neutrality".

For those of you who may not be familiar with it, the principle of Net
Neutrality basically prevents greedy telephone monopolies, cable companies,
ISP's, etc., from offering better and unrestricted Internet services to
those broadband customers who are willing to pay extra money for it, while
at the same time, offering inferior quality, and more restricted services to
those who aren't. In other words, the main idea behind the Net Neutrality
principle is that everyone should be treated the same, and receive the same
level and quality of broadband Internet service without partiality or
restrictions. However, Net Neutrality does not rule out tiered rates
systems, as far as I know.

The principle point of contention is that broadband providers feel that they
have the right to regulate their Internet services as they see fit, while
the FCC feels that said companies require more oversight in order to keep
things fair and above table.

As I said, I am not the least bit surprised by the outcome of Friday's
debate, or by the position that has been taken by Republicans -- and a few
Democrats -- in the House. Whenever Big Business interests are involved, it
is almost a certainty that the Republicans will be there to support them.
This bill was no different, and the Republicans reacted according to
expectations.

A New York Times article entitled "House Votes Against Net Neutrality" noted
in part:

----- Begin Quote -----

During the debate on Friday, each side accused the other of safeguarding the
interests of big companies. Democrats said that Republicans were protecting
the interests of the cable and phone company giants that are the dominant
providers of broadband Internet service to American households. Those
companies generally oppose the F.C.C. order, because they believe they need
to be able to direct traffic on their networks as they see fit.

Republicans countered by accusing Democrats of protecting big technology
companies, like Google, Amazon and Netflix, that have become successful
because of the lack of Internet regulation but which now want to protect
their turf from new competitors.

Few of the debaters raised some of the more technical issues that are at the
center of the debate over broadband regulation, like specialized services
and tiered rates. Specialized services, for which a broadband company uses
part of its Internet pipeline to deliver dedicated services to specific
customers, worry regulators who fear that companies will invest more to
develop those more profitable offerings while neglecting to update basic
broadband service.

----- End Quote -----

Personally, considering how much we already pay for our broadband Internet
service, I can't begin to imagine what would happen if these companies are
not brought under tighter control. Then again, handing too much power to a
government agency is worrisome as well.



Jeff Snyder, SysOp - Armageddon BBS  Visit us at endtimeprophecy.org port 23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Download Center 4 Mac BBS Software & Christian Files.  We Use Hermes II


--- Hermes Web Tosser 1.1
 * Origin: Armageddon BBS -- Guam, Mariana Islands (1:345/3777.0)