Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3354  |
|  Ardith Hinton to Alexander Koryagin  |
|  Moon  |
|  12 Oct 20 13:31:37  |
 
MSGID: 1:153/716.0 f848a7f6
REPLY: 2:221/6.0 5f7c608c
CHRS: IBMPC 2
Hi, Alexander! Recently you wrote in a message to All:
AK> In English, if an American has flown to Moon --
AK> does it mean he has been there? For instance, Apollo
AK> 13 was on its way to the Moon, but it had not been
AK> on the Moon. Or we should make the information more
AK> exact and say "he has been on the Moon". Is "on the
AK> Moon" legal?
I don't know of any jurisdiction where... as Henry Higgins put it...
"the cold-blooded murder of the English tongue" is an indictable offence. You
could say "acceptable" or "permissible" in a question like this, however. :-Q
If Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon in 1989 I see no problem with
saying Apollo 11 went to the moon or that he has been there. If... as someone
in another echo claims... the incident was filmed in a Hollywood movie studio,
I'd say this person allegedly walked on the moon.
I imagine you've also read news reports about an aeroplane which was
en route to SomePlace Else when it crash-landed in the ocean. I gather Apollo
13 was on its way to the moon, but never actually arrived on the moon.... :-)
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
* Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 123/131 138/146 153/0 250 757 802 6809
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/30 227/114 702 229/101
SEEN-BY: 229/275 424 426 664 1016 240/1120 1634 1895 2100 5138 5411
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38 280/5003
SEEN-BY: 280/5006 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 342/200 382/147
SEEN-BY: 423/81 2454/119 3634/12 4500/1 5020/1042
PATH: 153/7715 757 221/6 1 280/5003 240/1120 5832 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]