MSGID: 2:221/6.0 6068549c
REPLY: 1488.fido-englisht@1:3634/12 24c64e58
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20210401
CHRS: CP437 2
TZUTC: 0300
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2021-04-01
)\/(ark Lewis:

ML> there's  nothing  wrong  with that sentence... "several"
ML> specifically means "three or more but not too many more"
ML> ;)
ML>
ML> the  prepending  of "In this article" doesn't really add
ML> anything to the sentence...
ML>
ML> why did the chief of a computer-science laboratory think
ML> there was a problem with it?

My friend's account of it was so vague and incomplete that I
daredn't try retell it here. It  included,  for  example,  a
contrast  with  "a function of several arguments", which the
chief considered correct and which is in fact an interesting
example of `several' used in technical language with a mean-
ing that is wider than the general one: any naturual  number
greater than unity.

As to my friend's article, he has decided to replace `sever-
al' with `a number of' because he likes it better.

--- 
 * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 16/0 19/10 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/130 131 129/305
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 664
SEEN-BY: 229/700 1016 1017 240/1120 2100 5138 5411 5824 5832 5853
SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 261/38 280/5003 282/1038 317/3 320/119 219 319
SEEN-BY: 322/0 757 335/364 342/200 423/81 640/1384 2454/119 4500/1
SEEN-BY: 5020/1042
PATH: 221/6 1 320/219 240/5832 229/426