Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3722  |
|  Anton Shepelev to Ardith Hinton  |
|  To find a subject... 1.  |
|  02 Jul 21 13:54:54  |
 MSGID: 2:221/6.0 60def07a REPLY: 1:153/716.0 0dd36754 PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20210401 CHRS: CP437 2 TZUTC: 0300 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2021-05-15 Ardith Hinton: AH> While many sources regard "period" & "full stop" as AH> synonymous, BTW, my inclination is to think of a period AH> as a punctuation mark (.) which is used in various ways AH> but may be called a "full stop" at the end of a AH> sentence. This distiction between the punctuation character and one of its functions is very useful, do hold on fast to it. AH> I'm very careful to make such distinctions in my own AH> writing. I wish I did, too. We must strive to use words that best express the tints, shades, and nuaces of our intended meaning, lest we lose those fine niceties -- first from our thoughts, and then from our language. AH> However, it seems I am often overruled because double AH> spacing isn't allowed in programming jargon. Do you mean double spacing between sentences? That's absurd it should not be allowed, because *roff -- the oldest and nerdiest document-formatting system -- has natural support for it. It was desinged and implemented by die-hard UNIXoids. The famous Kernighan & Ritchie participated in the implementation and then wrote in it their masterpiece about C. I still prefer *roff to LaTeX and other modern document processors. AH> While it try to make my writing understandable to my AH> audience, I am constantly thwarted by programmers who AH> believe they can make it more efficient... (sigh). As my boss told a colleague who asked me to help her with transation into English, "Anton is much better at translating from Russian into C#." I know very few programmers who care about their (natural) language and have a taste for prose. Their attempts to refactor (to use programming jargon) your text may destroy it. But their optionion of what is said wrong and unclear is often correct, only the writer should be the one to make amendments! --- * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0) SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 30/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305 SEEN-BY: 154/10 218/700 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 SEEN-BY: 229/700 1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 261/38 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 301/0 1 101 113 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/200 460/58 712/848 SEEN-BY: 920/1 4500/1 5020/1042 5058/104 PATH: 221/6 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]