MSGID: 2:5075/128.130 90e68014
REPLY: 1:153/7715.0 1ca2cee0
CHRS: CP866 2
RFC: 1 0
RFC-Message-ID: 
RFC-References: 
TZUTC: 0300
PID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/31.7.0
TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-gd687923
Hi, Dallas Hinton!
I read your message from 27.12.2021 16:14

  DH> We'll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes; but the plural
  DH> of ox became oxen not oxes. One fowl is a goose, but two are
  DH> called geese, yet the plural of moose should never be meese.
  DH> You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice; yet the
  DH> plural of house is houses, not hice. If the plural of man is
  DH> always called men, why shouldn't the plural of pan be called
  DH> pen? If I spoke of my foot and show you my feet, and I give you
  DH> a boot, would a pair be called beet? If one is a tooth and a whole set
  DH> are teeth, why shouldn't the plural of booth be called beeth? Then one
  DH> may be that, and three would be those, yet hat in the plural would
  DH> never be hose, and the plural of cat is cats, not cose. We speak of a
  DH> brother and also of brethren, but though we say mother, we never say
  DH> methren. Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him, but imagine
  DH> the feminine, she, shis and shim.

For English learners it should be something more positive. ;-)

Bye, Dallas!
Alexander Koryagin
fido.english_tutor 2021
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 
hunderbird/31.7.0
 * Origin: Usenet Network (2:5075/128.130)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 30/0 50/109 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131
SEEN-BY: 129/305 154/10 218/700 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/424 426
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 250/25 261/38 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 301/0 1 101 113 317/3 322/757 342/200 450/1024 460/58 463/68
SEEN-BY: 467/888 712/848 920/1 5000/111 5001/100 5005/49 5015/42 46
SEEN-BY: 5019/40 5020/830 846 1042 2047 2140 4441 5053/51 5054/8 5058/104
SEEN-BY: 5064/56 5075/35 128 5080/68 102 5083/1 444
PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 301/1 229/426