MSGID: 2:5075/128.130 bc4a687f
REPLY: 1:153/716.0 20334567
CHRS: CP866 2
RFC: 1 0
RFC-Message-ID: 
RFC-References:  
TZUTC: 0300
PID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Th
nderbird/78.12.0
TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-gd687923
Hi Ardith Hinton!
I read your message on 10-Feb-2022

  AK>> I went to school to meet with headmaster. Capital of the US is
  AK>> Washington. Composer of "Moon sonata" is Beethoven. After school I
  AK>> went home. Head is part of body.

  AK>> Are there any examples how to disprove my rule?

  AH> After school [or work] I went home... that's correct.

  AH> WRT your other examples here, the article may be needed when you
  AH> are *not* using nouns in apposition... as you did in your initial
  AH> enquiry.

  AH>  The head is part of the body.

It can be understood that "This head is a part of this body" A criminal 
investigation. :)
And why not "a body"?

  AH> The capital of Canada is Ottawa, Ontario.
  AH> The President of the US remarked yesterday that... [blah blah].

Well, it seems, I see, "The" is necessary when there is no definition 
before the countable noun and this noun defines something unique.
In my case we will have "the" if we paraphrase the sentence:




Bye Ardith!
alexander koryagin
fido7.su.pol 2022
-=<{Linux Astra - Thunderbird 78.12.0 - akReformator_lx}>=-
--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
 * Origin: Usenet Network (2:5075/128.130)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 30/0 50/109 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340
SEEN-BY: 123/131 129/305 330 331 153/7715 154/10 218/700 221/1 6 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 206 317 424 426 664 700 240/1120 5832 250/25
SEEN-BY: 266/512 282/1038 301/0 1 101 113 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 450/1024 460/58 463/68 467/888 712/848 920/1 5000/111
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/42 46 5019/40 5020/830 846 1042 2047
SEEN-BY: 5020/2140 4441 5053/51 5054/8 5058/104 5064/56 5075/35 128
SEEN-BY: 5080/68 102 5083/1 444 5090/958
PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 301/1 229/426