MSGID: 2:5075/128.130 7118e5ef
REPLY: 2:221/6.0 63356f20
CHRS: CP866 2
RFC: 1 0
RFC-Message-ID: 
RFC-References:  
TZUTC: 0300
PID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Th
nderbird/78.6.1
TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-g97f4003
Hi Anton Shepelev!
I read your message on 29-Sep-2022

  AK>> Can we put "I will" instead of "I shall" -- all people do it by
  AK>> putting the shortening "'ll" after "I".
  AS> No, many careful writes abstain from this practice, and so do I.

Simplification of English is a long life tendency. The simpler you speak 
the bigger auditory listens to you. ;)

  AK>> Everybody understand. So we can. ;)

  AS> This utilitarian approach encourages negligient, slipshod language,
  AS> furthering its degeneration, which in turn degrades our thinking
  AS> and expression faculties by way of a vicious loop of positive
  AS> feedback. No, thanks.

In English a great lot of words sound similarly, but the context of the 
phrase usually gets the clue. Probably, not only the context, but even 
the "melody" of phrase.

Bye Anton!
Alexander
fidonews 2022
-=<{Linux Astra - Thunderbird 78.6.1 - akReformator_lx}>=-

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
 * Origin: Usenet Network (2:5075/128.130)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/0 16/0 19/10 37 50/109 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340
SEEN-BY: 123/130 131 129/305 153/7715 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 360 227/114
SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 206 317 424 426 428 470 664 700 240/5832
SEEN-BY: 250/25 266/512 280/5003 282/1038 301/1 317/3 320/119 219
SEEN-BY: 320/319 322/0 757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81
SEEN-BY: 450/1024 460/58 463/68 467/888 712/848 4500/1 5000/111 5001/100
SEEN-BY: 5005/49 5015/42 46 5019/40 5020/830 846 1042 4441 5030/49
SEEN-BY: 5053/51 5058/104 5064/56 5075/35 128 5080/102 5083/1 444
SEEN-BY: 5090/958
PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 221/6 1 320/219 229/426