MSGID: 2:221/6.0 63c8266c
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20230115
EID: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-mingw32).
CHRS: CP437 2
TZUTC: 0200
BBSID: KCO
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-01-07
Hello, all Can you help me decipher this piece of looney
legalese, in which I have masked the entity names:

   2023.01.17

   In accordance with the Agreement for Foo Services,
   CompanyOne (C1) and CompanyTwo (C2) agree to the
   termination of the 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 Foo Solution
   Agreement between CompanyTwo and CompanyOne ("the
   Agreement") pursuant to CompanyTwo's decision effective
   2023.02.24.

Apart from the terrible style, ambiguities, and probably
poor grammar, my question is: since what date is the said
agreement considered null and void and terminated?  Is it
since the date in the title of the document (2023.01.17), or
the date in the text (2023.02.24), which is in the future.
What does "effective 2023.02.24" -- effective since,
effective till, or nonsense?

--- 
 * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/0 16/0 19/10 37 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/130
SEEN-BY: 123/131 129/305 142/104 153/7715 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 100
SEEN-BY: 221/360 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114 206 307 317
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 428 470 664 700 240/5832 266/512 280/5003 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 301/1 317/3 320/119 219 319 2119 322/0 757 335/364 341/66
SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 712/848 4500/1 5020/1042
PATH: 221/6 1 320/219 229/426