MSGID: 2:221/6.0 65173d78
REPLY: 1:153/716.0 42ce0d01
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20230920
NOTE: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32).
CHRS: CP437 2
TZUTC: 0300
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
Ardith Hinton:

>     1)  From my POV there's general agreement as to the eight parts of speech
>         I learned about in my youth.  I know I can count on the dictionary in
>         almost any European language to employ the same terminology even if I
>         don't understand their idea of gender.  And until you & Anton started
>         asking more advanced questions the Russians seemed content... [grin].
>
>     2)  During the 1960's various linguists objected to the old rules & tried
>         to make improvements... one of which I suspect may be the addition of
>         the word "particle" in this context.  Not all dictionaries include it
>         because it's not universally accepted & if you find it at all you may
>         find little or no general agreement as to what it means.  At least if
>         e.g. somebody adds articles to the parts of speech I get the picture,
>         because I already know the term "article" as a subset of "adjective".
>

Is possible -- two perfect bricks!

--- 
 * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 123/131
SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 215 700 720 840 850
SEEN-BY: 218/860 870 880 930 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113
SEEN-BY: 229/206 307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 266/512 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 291/111 301/1 113 305/3 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66
SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 460/58 712/848 5020/400 1042 5075/35
PATH: 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426