Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3983  |
|  Alexander Koryagin to Anton Shepelev  |
|  Some issues from some books  |
|  06 Oct 23 16:35:28  |
 MSGID: 2:221/6.0 65200d18 REPLY: 2:221/6.0 651efda6 PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20231003 NOTE: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0. CHRS: LATIN-1 2 TZUTC: 0300 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24 Hi, Anton Shepelev! -> Alexander Koryagin I read your message from 05.10.2023 20:17 AK>> "I will have my hair cut" > AK>> "Cut" is not a verb. AS> I am sure it is: AS> I will have him repair my car. (1) "Repair" is a verb, and you use the direct object here. And therefore you had to use "to" before the verb. Another example: "He asked me to wait a little". AS> I will have my car repaired. (2) AS> `repair' is certainly a verb in both cases. You may call it a past AS> participal in the second instance, And indeed is is a past particiPLE. ;) AS>because it partakes of the verb, or, is partially a verb. I don't understand your logic here. AS> Analyse the present-tense example, if you AS> like it more: "I will have her cut my hair," where `cut' is a verb AS> beyond the faintest shadow of a doubt. What does Dallas think about your "beyond faintest shadow of a doubt"? Bye, Anton! Alexander Koryagin english_tutor 2023 --- * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0) SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 123/131 SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 215 700 720 840 850 SEEN-BY: 218/860 870 880 930 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 SEEN-BY: 229/206 307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 266/512 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 291/111 301/1 113 305/3 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 460/58 712/848 5020/400 1042 5075/35 PATH: 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]