Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 4120  |
|  Anton Shepelev to Alexander Koryagin  |
|  Re: Grammar in the Bar  |
|  04 Jun 24 17:32:52  |
 MSGID: 2:221/6.0 665f2592 REPLY: 2:221/6.0 665ec9b2 PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240505 NOTE: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) CHRS: CP437 1 TZUTC: 0300 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02 Alexander Koryagin: AK> The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that AK> provides anything to make the understanding more clear. Above I wrote /why/ the Oxford comma is necessary for the clariy, unambiguity, and regularity of the enumeration. You, on the other hand, do not disclose your arguments... AK> With the same success you canput "and" before every AK> comma in the list. ;-) Don't you think it will make the list structure ugly and redundant? --- * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700 720 SEEN-BY: 218/840 850 860 870 880 930 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 300 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 266/512 SEEN-BY: 282/1038 291/111 301/1 113 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 460/58 712/848 5020/400 1042 5075/35 PATH: 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]