Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 4121  |
|  Alexander Koryagin to Anton Shepelev  |
|  Grammar in the Bar  |
|  07 Jun 24 16:02:08  |
 MSGID: 2:221/6.0 666304c8 REPLY: 2:221/6.0 665f2592 PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240505 NOTE: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 CHRS: LATIN-1 2 TZUTC: 0300 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02 Hi, Anton Shepelev! I read your message from 04.06.2024 14:32 AK>> The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that provides AK>> nothing to make the understanding more clear. AS> Above I wrote /why/ the Oxford comma is necessary for the clariy, AS> unambiguity, and regularity of the enumeration. You, on the other AS> hand, do not disclose your arguments... I think that the main, core purpose to put a comma is highlighting a pause in speech. That is the comma was born. I.e. in general it is like a pause sign in musical score. We can easily imagine situation when people don't know how to write at all, but they can express themselves in a fine way. In the list a comma serves as a separator and "and" does the same role. AK>> With the same success you canput "and" before every comma in the AK>> list. ;-) AS> Don't you think it will make the list structure ugly and redundant? Redundant mainly. You will do a thing twice. You can say even every word twice, but will it be helpful? Bye, Anton! Alexander Koryagin english_tutor 2024 --- * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700 720 SEEN-BY: 218/840 850 860 870 880 930 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 300 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 266/512 SEEN-BY: 282/1038 291/111 301/1 113 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 460/58 712/848 5020/400 1042 5075/35 PATH: 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]