Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 4131  |
|  Alexander Koryagin to Ardith Hinton  |
|  Grammar in the Bar  |
|  28 Jun 24 17:08:54  |
 MSGID: 2:221/6.0 667ec3f2 REPLY: 1:153/716.0 67ce0884 PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240505 NOTE: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 CHRS: LATIN-1 2 TZUTC: 0300 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02 Hi, Ardith Hinton! I read your message from 27.06.2024 03:06 AK>> The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that provides AK>> anything to make the understanding more clear. AH> It's a matter of style, not an absolute requirement, and some AH> people recommend using it only when it's needed to avoid confusion: AH> Through the window I saw John, a basketball player and a friend of AH> mine. Are there three of them? ;-) For me, this is not a list, but a sentence with the additional information, separated with a comma from the main clause. I believe that a _good_ list must consists of homogeneous items. Nobody can prohibit you, of course, to add to the list also a puddle, car, dog and a cat, but I think it will be rather a word game. If we have a good list (of names, for instance) we would have: Through the window I saw John, Peter and Paul, who staggered out from the pub. AH> What is this friend's name, and is he a basketball player? I have AH> no idea. I found the example in Wikipedia... I didn't personally AH> invent it. As we say in Russia "Be simpler and people appreciate it". ;) AH> I asked for coffee with a breakfast of pancakes, bacon & eggs, hot AH> buttered toast and hash brown potatoes. Yeah, no comma before potatoes. ;) AH> At 5WPM I can type an added comma without having to fret about AH> whether someone from ElseWhere will think I buttered the hash AH> browns *after* they were cooked. For me it's easier to use the AH> Oxford comma routinely in such a list than to go into detail about AH> why buttering such things on the plate may not work. Yes, I agreed it is not important in chats. It maybe there are some doubts when you translate something. Old Everett Hertenstein taught me that the main thing is to be consistent. ;-) AH> If Denis asks I'll do the latter, but other folks may not care. :-Q AH> BTW, here's a joke Dallas found shortly before your message AH> arrived: AH> I like cooking my family and my pets. -- commas save lives The comma after "cooking" is a holy one, of course. ;) But not the one which could be before "my pets". AK>> With the same success you can put "and" before every comma in the AK>> list. ;-) AH> I suppose you could in many cases. But as Anton says, in English it AH> is generally considered desirable to avoid unnecessary verbiage.... AH> [chuckle]. An unnecessary comma before "and" is good mainly because nobody pays any attention to it. ;-) Bye, Ardith! Alexander Koryagin english_tutor 2024 --- * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700 720 SEEN-BY: 218/840 850 860 870 880 930 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 300 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 266/512 SEEN-BY: 282/1038 291/111 301/1 113 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 460/58 712/848 5020/400 1042 5075/35 PATH: 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]