MSGID: 2:221/6.0 66d187fe
REPLY: 1:153/7715.0 6ca0f5d0
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240505
NOTE: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
CHRS: CP437 1
TZUTC: 0300
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02
Dallas Hinton about `coward':

DH> I've never seen the word used as an adjective. I suspect
DH> it's an archaic usage. The Cambridge dictionary doesn't
DH> define it as an adjective (listing only "cowardly"),
DH> same for Merriam-Webster, Collins, and the Britannica
DH> Dictionary. The Oxford dictionary shows it used an
DH> adjective but last used in 1818!

1913 Webster lists `coward' as an adjective:

  

So I was too blunt.

I think `coward' /can/ be an adjective by virtue of the
ability of nouns in English to become adjectives in certain
cirsumstances, such as:

  systems (vs. systematic) programming
  fall guy
  finger man
  glass (not glassy) jar.

That said, `coward' is no more an ajective than `widow' in
the famous tautology `widow woman'.

--- 
 * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 16/0 19/37 90/1 105/81 106/201 123/130 129/305 142/104
SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 840 221/1 6 360 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 114 206 300 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/5832
SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/5003 282/1038 291/111 301/1 320/119 219 319 2119
SEEN-BY: 322/757 762 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58
SEEN-BY: 712/848 5020/400 1042 5075/35
PATH: 221/6 1 320/219 229/426