Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 4214  |
|  Ardith Hinton to Alexander Koryagin  |
|  Strange a bit  |
|  26 Oct 24 16:24:28  |
 
MSGID: 1:153/716.0 71d41401
REPLY: 2:221/6.0 6716083e
CHRS: IBMPC 2
Hi, Alexander! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:
AK> Usually in English e, i, y tell us about specific pronunciation
AK> of the syllable behind. For instance, "bit"/"bite", "kit"/"kite".
The final "e" tells us how to pronounce the "i" in your examples...
during medieval times, however, both letters may have been spoken aloud.
AK> However in astrology
Or numerology, methinks.... :-)
AK> every letter is important and they say can change the person's
AK> destiny. ;)
Uh-huh. In English, you can spell a family name "Smythe" & require
others to pronounce it "Smith". Years ago I knew somebody who did that. And
names like "Brown" & "Clark" may be spelled with or without a final "e". The
spelling of one's name may or may not influence the audience's reaction. :-Q
AH> Pronunciations in English often vary from one time & place to
AH> another... and I don't know where this name originated. But
AH> IMHO it's most likely the pronunciation changed & we never got
AH> around to changing the spelling. I'm told that's what happened
AH> with e.g. "gnash" and "knife".... :-)
AK> It would be interesting for me to learn who threw "k" first and
AK> why others started follow him. ;-)
I don't know who did it or when... the OED might tell us more about
that... but for native speakers of English, the initial consonants are rather
difficult to pronounce without adding a vowel when one follows immediately on
the other. I'm reminded here of the Danish King "Canute" (as I was taught to
spell his name). During the 11th century he was king of England. But he was
king of Denmark & Norway too... and many historians nowadays spell it "Cnut".
While that may be more authentic from their POV I don't speak Danish.... :-)
AH> I get the impression the upper classes in Russia preferred
AH> French (which may have worked for them when they didn't want
AH> the servants to get the drift) until they became disenchanted
AH> with Napoleon, then carefully reconstructed what's now your
AH> native language. The net result from my POV is that it's a
AH> lot younger than my native language & doesn't include
AH> complications like "silent letters"....
AK> Yes, the French got a great impact on the Russian language,
AK> but Russians did not accept those crazy silent letters. So
AK> Bordeaux in Russia is just Bordo, and nobody suffers from it.
To my ears, however, the second "o" is elongated. If your language
makes no such distinction I understand. I have to keep reminding myself that
e.g. the word "venue" is pronounced differently in English & French.... :-))
AK> in the USA they simplified English they could do the same. What
AK> a lot of ink they could save! ;)
When the USA was established there were alternative spellings for a
large number of words. They tended to choose the shorter & simpler ones, but
this theory doesn't necessarily work as advertised in practice... [wry grin].
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
* Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
SEEN-BY: 90/1 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/7715 218/700 221/1
SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/30 227/114 229/110 114 206 300 317 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 1634 5832 8001 8002 8005 8050 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 291/111 301/1 113 313/41 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 335/364 342/200 371/0 396/45 460/58 256 1124 5858 712/848
SEEN-BY: 5020/400 1042 5054/30 5075/35
PATH: 153/7715 3634/12 240/1120 301/1 460/58 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]