MSGID: 1:153/716.0 77097642
REPLY: 2:5023/24.4222 676aae50
CHRS: IBMPC 2
Hi, Gleb!  Recently you wrote in a message to Alexander Koryagin:

GH>  Again, as you may surmise, using articles is tricky.

           Yes, I've noticed over the years that my Russian correspondents
tend to have difficulty with articles in English.  Based on what little I
understand of the Russian language I figure I'd have a very similar problem
there....  :-)


GH>  I'd say that you rely too much on dictionaries and try
GH>  to over-formalise your approach to language learning

           !?  I conclude your preferred learning styles differ.  Alexander
has been actively involved here for a long time & what he's doing seems to
work for him.  I probably own more dictionaries & refer to them more often
than a lot of other people do.  I'd like to think I help my readers use them
more efficiently
... but you may not have been here long enough to notice I say on occasion
"Did you continue reading as far as definition #12, where I found the
answer?"  :-))


GH>  in real life, in fiction, newspapers/magazines, talk
GH>  shows etc., it may at times look a bit different.

           If you want to see & hear native speakers saying "would of never"
in our local news or some advertiser telling you the XYZ Company is best
qualified to update your windows because they are "real perfessionals" it
certainly does. I don't rely on these sources for examples of good English
usage...


GH>  In our case I'd say it's an "object vs. substance" thing.

           (which any dictionary I'd give house room to will probably tell you)


GH>  Here are some instances from a website I find suitable:

GH>        "Brick" as substance/material:

GH>        "Drilling into brick is a key DIY skill, needed for
GH>  all kinds of home improvement projects."

           ... but I understand & appreciate that native speakers tend to
learn by example while dictionaries cut these things short.  We all have our
talents. If you know how how to find material such as the above, I'm most
grateful.  :-)


AK>  The Great Chinese wall is "wall" or "a wall" if I approach
AK>  to it?

GH>  It can only be referred to as THE Wall, given its singular and
GH>  unique nature (the same as the Moon, the Earth's only natural
GH>  satellite). No other options here. :-)

           To Alexander I'd say "I were to approach it" or "I approached
it"... to you I'd say something more like "You've never heard of Hadrian's
Wall?"  :-Q




--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 138/142 146 153/757 7715 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 114 206 300 317 426 428 470 664 700
SEEN-BY: 229/705 266/512 275/100 1000 282/1038 291/111 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 342/11 200 396/45 460/58 712/848 1321 902/26 3634/12 5020/400
SEEN-BY: 5075/35
PATH: 153/7715 229/426