MSGID: 2:221/1.0 68f633fe
REPLY: 2:221/1.0 68f3c65a
PID: JamNNTPd/Linux32/IPv6 ubi386 20251012
NOTE: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/31.7.0
CHRS: LATIN-1 2
TZUTC: 0300

Hi, Anton Shepelev!
I read your message from 18.10.2025 19:54

 AK>> Johnson and Bell had a good supper awaiting them. But
 AK>> before they sat down to table, the doctor said in a
 AK>> voice of triumph, as he pointed to his two
 AK>> companions,-- ----- The end of the citation -----
 AK>>
 AK>> Can you say a formal excuse why "table" in the last sentence
 AK>> is used without any article?

 AS> This usage needs no excuse, being perfectly correct. Here a
 AS> combination of a preposition and a noun in the objective case
 AS> acts as a unified proposition, cf. /on top of/, /in place of/,
 AS> ??&c. Observe also the title of a Dunany short story,
 AS> /Thirteen at table/, where /at table/ is singe united
 AS> proposition.

Did you read somewhere about "unified prepositions" (URL please) or it is your
idea?
Maybe it will be interesting for you what native speakers tell about the subj
in other places.

https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/at-table-at-the-table.3982769/

Bye, Anton!
Alexander Koryagin
english_tutor 2025

---
 * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/1.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 16/0 19/37 105/81 106/201 123/130 128/187 129/14 305
SEEN-BY: 142/104 153/7715 154/110 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 226/30 227/114
SEEN-BY: 229/110 206 300 317 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/5832 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 291/111 301/1 320/119 219 319 2119 322/757 762 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/81 460/58 712/848 902/26 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 221/1 320/219 229/426